Monday, 10 March 2008

THANK YOU, MALAYSIANS!



Thank you one and all - for saving Democracy in Malaysia!

I'm truly humbled by the level of awareness created by our leaders.
A special THANK YOU
to our dear RPK/ Malaysia Today, Haris Ibrahim/ The People's Parliament, Ahirudin Atan/Rocky's Bru, Jeff Ooi/ Screenshots, all the NGOs, DSAI, TG Hadi, LKS and all those who worked hard with limited resources to give us all hope, and make this dream a reality!

Last but not least, thank you to all brothers and sisters of the blogging community -

This was a victory of the alternative media over MSM!

I'm humbled by the response of the Malaysians
towards matters of national interest!

This was a victory for all Malaysians - regardless of color/creed or partisan politics.

Let us now go forth and work with the
State and Federal Governments of the day as partners in Nation building!

Truly - Malaysians Boleh!!!!


Friday, 7 March 2008

"Barisan Rakyat", Raja Petra, Haris Ibrahim


"In the absence of justice, what is sovereignty but organized robbery?"
-Saint Augustine


Here's a clip from the Forum on the ISA arrest of the Hindraf 5:-


We were brought to understand that our Leaders - Raja Petra, Haris Ibrahim and Ronnie Liu - dynamic bloggers/ speakers were prevented from speaking on Penang Island.
Raja Petra then spoke on the Mainland ..... and so he writes,


"Yesterday, I was in Penang. There were numerous ceramahs organised all over Penang. The police granted the organisers permits for these ceramahs but on condition that I would be barred from speaking. Haris Ibrahim and Ronnie Liu were also banned from speaking. I still spoke nevertheless. I spoke at Jalan Raja Uda. I was waiting for the police to come a calling and if they shout, “Hoi, you think this is your grandfather's road or what?” I would have replied, “Yes it is, my grandfather was Raja Sir Tun Uda.”"
-
Raja Petra, Malaysia Today, No Holds Barred, "Melayu Umno dan Cina DAP bodoh"

"Tunku Abdul Rahman, Bapa Merdeka, refused to join Umno Baru in 1988, as did Tun Hussein Onn. Both these founding fathers of Malaysia died outside Umno. They wanted to have nothing to do with Umno. They went to their graves despising the new Umno, which they said no longer represented what Umno stood for......."

"“We can't abolish postal votes. If we do, then not a single Cabinet member would be able to retain his or her seat,” argued Rashid during one meeting that was held to discuss how to reform Malaysia's election system.

Postal voting was introduced at the time the soldiers spent nine months on end deep in the Malaysian jungles at the height of the Communist insurgency known as The Emergency. Of course, The Emergency has since ended with the signing of the Peace Treaty between the Malaysian government and the Communist Party of Malaya. But the postal voting system remains.

The assembly was taken aback and flabbergasted that such a bold admission would come out from the mouth of the head-honcho of the Elections Commission. At least lie. At least pretend. But to tell the assembly direct to its face that postal voting is not about allowing the security forces to exercise their right to vote but about ensuring that Ministers stay in office is like telling you to your face 'fuck you'.

Is it not the job of the Elections Commission to run a free and fair election? No, said Rashid. The job of the Elections Commission is to ensure that the Malays do not lose political domination. With that second 'fuck you' to your face there was no point in continuing with the meeting. The assembly of opposition politicians just stood up and walked out of the room. It was clear that not only was the job of the Elections Commission to rig the elections and ensure that the ruling coalition stays in office, but they will do so boldly and will admit it to your face while telling you to shove off and go screw yourself."


-Raja Petra, Malaysia Today, Corridors of Power, " Why we are voting tomorrow"










"Seek not to understand that you may believe, but believe that you may understand."
-Saint Augustine

Tuesday, 4 March 2008

Democracy, Mind Games, and Voter Apathy by Design.



"A people that values its privileges above its principles soon loses both.
" -Dwight D. Eisenhower


A letter to the Editor of Malaysia Today entitled "
Never insult the people!" (written by Naruto) said, "Have they not insulted the people enough? Perhaps the DAP has come up with the perfect slogan – Just change it! This is excellent and the timing is perfect - it’s time to change the opposition. Malaysia is in serious need of one strong opposition that can measure up the formidable BN for a better and healthy democracy. That is the way forward toward better future."

This was my reply to Naruto:-
"While I may agree with you that the constantly highlighted differences between the fractured opposition that plays along with the divisive politics of the ruling BN is an insult to the people, I believe that you have missed out on the bigger insults dished out by the Racist politicians of the Ruling political bullies.

BN/ UMNO, by virtue of its actions by curtailing the freedom of the media, gerrymandering and abusing the postal votes for the sake of consolidating their power and securing the 2/3 majority is the bigger insult.
The hundreds of amendments to the constitution - that's the real Insult.
Subverting the Judiciary - That's an insult!
The 2/3 majority in parliament, stifles debate and lends a hand to the corruption that you propose, would determine "better future for all Malaysian with continuing Security, Peace and Prosperity." - That's an insult!

The ISA, Printing presses Act, OSA, stifling of student politics, subservient academics and pseudo-intellectuals, "kangkung" professors - These are Insults that you are possibly blinded to.

Expression of dissent isn't.
Freedom of thought and belief isn't.
A weak Opposition struggling to seek common ground, ISN"T!

Wake up Naruto!!!
Your ideas are laughable at best!!"


Indeed - Malaysia is in dire need of a more credible opposition that does not play along with the corrupt methods and ideas of the power brokers, who are bent on amassing wealth and consolidating power, in the name of Racial/Religious Hegemony and fascism (aka - Security, Peace and Prosperity).
Hence, the efforts by the people at beating the
"divide and rule policies" with the "People's Declaration", where the people dictate the terms to their "wakil".

Tun Musa had an interview published in NST, (and yes, I did buy NST last Sunday - My apologies to Haris Ibrahim), to read what he had to say about Human rights, Democracy, elections, and the much deplored "apathy" of the 5 million unregistered voters in Malaysia.
Tun Musa now stays out of active politics after having compromised on his principles and had joined UMNO Baru of his one time "nemesis", after the real UMNO was dissolved. It is probably understandable that the temptations that TDM laid before him were too much for some "patriots" to handle - the privileges of a "Tun-ship" accorded to giving up his principles were possibly too much for mere mortals as Musa Hitam. TDM rightfully quoted, "Every man has his price" - and Musa had his too.
He is however very much courted as a "statesman" - and his "intellectual views" are apparently much desired in order to lend credibility in an administration that is hard-pressed for it.

While I agree that the extent of voter apathy in Malaysia is at epidemic proportions, and needs to be rectified, no amount of talk from "intellectual statesmen" would change anything unless there is any political will within the ruling party.

Tun Musa Sir - How could one expect voters to be enthusiastic about elections should they be paranoid about persecution?
How do you, as one who has compromised on principles for privileges, point a finger at the electorate who only do the same?


And then you go on to say, "Bigots and dictators rose when there was apathy among those who love democracy" - rightfully so. And you argue that, if one doesn't vote, one is "anti-democratic".

How ironic ...... coming from you, who stands by the methods of UMNO Baru that undermines democracy within itself, in return for the privileges accorded to you. These are the "guardians of democracy" in Malaysia!
Dear Sir, UMNO is dead - what we have now is UMNO Baru.
You now applaud the very organization that you once stood against when righteousness was raped, and that which its own creator says needs to be corrected from the outside!

Your membership and support for this organization that extends the tenure of the EC Chairman by
subverting the constitution,through abuse of the 2/3 majority in parliament does not augur well for you, Tun!
And you call yourself a "critic of the Government"?
That is surely is a new definition of the word, Sir! Greater men such as Tun Hussein and the
Tunku have instead chosen to die outside the fold of these "political elite", who have become dictators, little Napoleons and bigots in their own right.

Dear Tun Musa Sir - you had also said in the interview," ...-if there is any "-ism" that you want talk about that really needs attention, it is not ...... It is "stomach-ism" - the issue of the stomach".
Not necessarily so, dear Sir-
This actually underlines the lack of spirituality on the part of the current crop of warlords in our political hierarchy.
If that isn't an insult, I don't really know what is - it was probably this idea that drove you to join UMNO Baru after being humiliated by your nemesis.

It is more than than, Dear Sir!
Allow me to quote a wise sociologist - "Man does not live on bread alone ....".
To justify stripping man of his dignity in return for wealth, reduces the recepient to nothing more than an animal - and this is what the ideology and doctrine of UMNO Baru is all about.

UMNO Baru and their "chamchas" seek to strip the Malaysians of human dignity, intimidate them, and corrupt their values in return for "financial incentives", scholarships, sewing machines, "kain pelikat", contracts, shares, money, glamour, pride, chauvinism and rewards for mediocrity and every conceivable sin.

Is it any wonder that many have sought refuge in "religion"?
The leaders of these exploitative policies on the other hand have resorted to "religiosity" to make up for their lack of spirituality, through attempts at repressing & subjugating the religious minorities, sometimes violently so.
Is it any wonder that there has been a public backlash through Hindraf, Bersih and the Blogs with the rise in awareness via the new media of internet which the Government appears to detest and attempts to suppress through intimidation, confiscation and harassment?

If anything is true - it is the fact that, it is the "state machinery" that encourages this "voter apathy" that you speak of, Tun. It is be design that they have been frustrated in their attempts to for human dignity. It is by design that they have been indoctrinated to believe in racial supremacy, political docility, bigotry and stripped of their human dignity. It through the propaganda tools that is called the mainstream media that dissenters are painted black and humiliated - and the ideas of fascism propagated under the guise of democracy.

It is also true that the people are subjected to a campaign of lies and deception for the benefit of bigots and fascists who rob the nation's wealth.
They are also told repeatedly that it isn't within their right to be human beings with dignity - so much so that the gullible man on the street believes in it.

The citizen that put the "leaders" in high offices are reduced to workhorses that just supposed to only work to fill their bellies - oblivious to their human rights and dignity.
Just like you, they too have come to believe that life is "better" when you surrender your soul and human rights at the altar of material gain- that righteousness, ethics, philosophy and all the values that make you a man, isn't worth the price.


That is what "Voter Apathy" is all about, dear Sir.
It is what the power brokers need to perpetuate their rule. It is what "you" desire, despite all your verbose morality.

Did I read that you said, "it is fantastic that the leadership is admitting and trying to rectify it (their mistakes)?"

Yeah, right! Maybe there are pigs flying around town, Tun Musa- just maybe!


Wednesday, 27 February 2008

The Price of Votes & Convictions.

"The society which scorns excellence in plumbing as a humble activity, and tolerates shoddiness in philosophy because it is an exalted activity, will have neither good plumbing nor good philosophy: neither its pipes nor its theories will hold water."
- John W. Gardner

Before I start on matters at hand, allow me to wish my Dad, A Very Happy 77th Birthday - may the good Lord Bless You.
Pa, I apologize for the fact that your dreams for this nation have not materialized as yet, and it appears that it is slip-sliding into a very precarious position of uncertainty. I shall come however, to take Mummy and you to the voting centre on the 8th of March.

Let's move on now ....
There's nothing like a Sunday, sitting at a comfortable place with your "worries" put aside for some moments, and thinking or reading what you what you really enjoy, oblivious to the hustle and bustle around you.

As I sat in Starbucks yesterday, sipping my iced tea, listening to music and doing some reading, I received a text message. It was one of those messages that are meant to campaign for one party or other - in keeping with the Election season.
It went like this -

"Gerakan is contesting 12 Parliament seats and 31 State seats. All 43 of them r Chinese. No Ind. They say no capable Indians in Msia. This is what multi-racialism is all about, in BN. DAP is fielding a record 30 Inds - 10 for Parliament and 20 for State seats. Dear bros & sis, lets show that we can make an impact and we can deny BN 2/3 majority .. pls send to 10 Indians."

It must've been a message that started in Penang, where the "great battle" is supposed to take place - and it found its way south.
After an hour or so, the same message came from somebody else, then another. This morning, another one more came!

Pardon me for not applauding DAP's "achievement" - I found the message laughable at best .... and in a sense, actually degrading!
(but of course I did forward it to one, when the "message within" struck me as odd!)

Let us take stock of Gerakan first.
Gerakan is basically a party with a constitution that isn't racially exclusive, just as PPP. However, it is a known fact that in practise, one caters to the "Chinese" and the other, "Indians" - in line with the BN concept of political, racial segregation. They thus, are only practicing what they preach - i.e, racial exclusivity and fragmentation of the people's representation in the Parliament.
No doubt, Gerakan was established with noble ideals which were a real threat to the hegemony practised by the racist parties in power at that time - and as such, it was seduced into a "working formula" which in due time corrupted the membership, and was thus rendered impotent as a force to be reckoned with at national level politics. It has today been reduced to just another race-based party that has only a sprinkling of representation from "others". Yes - they too have been reduced to just another racist party, as their partners in this crime of RACISM and aparthied.

DAP on the other hand, while blowing the altruistic horn of multi-culturism and pluralism, is dominated by the "Chinese" with some "Indian" representation. It was odd that they don't seem to be able to find Malays in their midst to justify this claim.
After fifty years of blowing their horn of pluralism, intentionally or otherwise, they have failed in their mission to convince the people that they don't play the "race politics", in line with the ruling coalition.

Why then have they chosen to to ride on their moral high-horse of "pluralism"? They have failed to convince the Malay voters that they would be a viable alternative, and that they could be trusted to take care of their interests.
The campaign video on YouTube was pathetic at best- with the narrator (was it Mr. LKS?) speaking Malay with an obviously "Chinese" accent.
The sorry attempt at speaking good Malay, would only reach out to "Indians" and other communities that haven't really integrated themselves to Malaysian norms after half a century of calling themselves "MALAYSIAN".

A Malay wouldn't want to listen for more than 5 seconds to someone who "murders" the language, his mother-tongue and National Language.
Would it have been too difficult for Mr. LKS to hire a professional speaker to get his message across?
I don't think so - there are many people of various ethnicity who speak Malay fluently, and he's definitely not one of them.


The reason I mention the accent (alright, I admit ... that was a "cheap shot"), is the fact that for one to actually want to integrate into society at large, one has to be able to at least speak the language well. Language is the "key" to integration in any society.

Take USA for example - do you really think all these guys who shout out their "rights" like misfits in parliament, would or could do the same in US of A?
Definitely not.
Were it the US of A, I would bet that in 6 months, Mr. LKS, Semi Value and the others would've "acquired" the American accent through intensive training.

I call upon all MPs from all parties to seek professional assistance where speaking Bahasa Malaysia, Bahasa Melayu or whatever you call it is concerned. Let us not be too arrogant in claiming that it is our right to "be ourselves" and expect "tolerance", when we have not made an earnest attempt at speaking the National Language well, after half a century. One's ethnic heritage isn't a barrier - only the will, or rather, the lack of it.
Without linguistic proficiency, to expect "acceptance" among the people, would be foolish, and very much desirable to the practitioners of "apartheid" - Malaysian style.


What I intend to say here, isn't so much as to run them down during this time of intense political campaigning.
On the contrary - I intend to appeal to all Malaysians to stop looking at ethnic representation in describing "achievements". It means nothing, if it isn't demeaning.
It only says that you cannot be trusted, unless you are of "my kind".

I call upon all groups/ communities to give due respect to the National Language and cut down their racist rhetoric during this campaign season.

All those of you who fight for "Bangsa Malaysia", ask yourselves if you could speak Malay as a person born and bred in Malaysia should. Or would you make the excuse that you opted for vernacular education, and only mingled with those "of your own kind", and are thus exempted from this necessity, in line with desires of the racists who have never really encouraged integration. Who are we to demand "acceptance" when we highlight our "difference" the moment we speak?

Dear friends, do not live under the impression that we did have a common identity at any one time in the past - we never had it. The Brit "masters" never did encourage it, and the post-independence governments simply perpetuated it in the name of "tolerance" under the much lauded "social contract", that practiced "separate development" as in the Pietr Botha regime of South Africa.

The "Indians" of SA in general, although denied equal rights, were adept at their business ventures and as such were economically self sufficient and had little to complain, except where "human rights" were concerned. They came into contact with "others" only when the need arose - just as it was in Malaysia during the time of the "White Tuans", and immediately after they left, to have their legacy perpetuated by the "New Tuans" and "Kapitans" - with each ethnic community "taking care of their own interests".
A problem was not perceived as that of national interest, but exclusive to that of only a particular community - just as illustrated by the "Hindraf Phenomenon".

While it may have been the tyranny of the minority in SA, it is just vice-versa in Malaysia. Yes - they too had a "social contract" - they only difference is, in Malaysia, it is apparently "in favour of the majority" (or so they would want to have you believe, to justify the "social contract").

The truth however is, that the minority bourgeoisie elite of each community are the ones who reap the harvest - lock, stock and barrel.
All these, while the commoner becomes the second-class workhorse in a rat-race, or the apparent beneficiaries are kept in psychological or socio-economic straightjackets, being blinded by sentiments of racial and/or religious chauvinism/prejudice, that dull the senses.

Dear friends and potential Members of Parliament,
Do justice to the citizenship of the country.
Speak the language of wisdom and reject "racial/ religious profiling".
Seek common ground, instead of highlighting differences in word and/ or deed.
Please refrain from playing to the gallery of racism and religiosity - it is the playing field of criminals. Be ashamed of the religious/ racial chauvinism and exclusivity.
Appeal to universal values that you would be proud of wherever you go.
Do not be drawn into competition in conflicts of ethnic/ religious exclusivity or supremacy and keep the interests of "Nationhood" at heart.

What we are experiencing as a Nation, is "teething problems" in integration- the fallout of the increasing awareness and contact among Malaysians from all walks of life, as a result of communication, and breakdown of the barriers that are upheld by the "social contract".
Many are intimidated by "perceived threats" of dispossession, and others, of reactionary prejudice, played up by unscrupulous politicians and religious zealots, for political mileage.

Conflicts are bound to surface with regard to the debate pertaining to the colonial formula of "separate development" that is practiced by the ruling coalition.
Let us not play along with it.

To the ruling coalition - I call upon you to seek intellectuals who can articulate their ideas of nationhood, instead of imbeciles and gangsters who further inflame sectarian politics in the interest of further consolidating political power that corrupts.
Do away with the uneducated and small-minded extremist elements that feed the rot in the party, and the nation at large.
Reject race based political initiatives and political dynasties.
Welcome intelligent debates in a civil manner and be bold enough to reprimand misbehaviour among party members.
Encourage freedom of thought, and do not expect representatives to "toe the party line", instead of keeping interests of the nation at heart.
Look upon your "adversaries" in the "opposition" as partners in nation building, as opposed to "enemies of state" - as currently practiced.
Break down the virtual walls of sectarian partisan politics, and cut out the racist rhetoric that is the root of all the problems that you face.
The political ghettos and national fragmentation that are testaments to your policies and achievements, will not serve to build a national identity. Resorting to "arabisation" in the name of "religiosity" would only serve to emasculate the rich heritage that has evolved over the centuries. The adoption and enforcement of cultural attributes from an alien land, would only serve to confuse the very ones you seek to uplift and thus, would become their Achilles Heel.
Last but not least, cease from subverting the sanctity of the very constitution that's the cornerstone of the Nation- by amending the constitution at liberty and abusing the mandate of the people - symptomatic solutions that render the constitution meaningless, is nothing but a prescription for civil strife and discord, that doesn't augur well for the future.
Free the media and refrain from turning them into instruments of nonsensical propaganda to fool an ignorant public (which may be desirable, to the leeches of the nation).
Free our institutions of higher learning from the political stranglehold that they now drown in - what would result is, nothing but a generation of mindless adults who are but "educated into imbecility".
Do not perceive a vote for the "opposition" as unpatriotic, lest history casts you alongside Hitler's Reichsmarshall Hermann Goering who declared that "people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. This is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and attack the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger".

As for the Election Commission - do justice to the office that you hold, instead of being the handmaid for certain unsavoury characters.
Arbitrary rules that can be made and retracted at one's whim & fancy while you ignore the law, wouldn't help you make claims of "impartiality".
Do have a sense of shame, when you speak of "a level playing field", accountability, transparency and the desire for the authority to charge voters for libel in Kangaroo courts.


With this, I call upon all Malaysians to cast their votes wisely taking into consideration the evils that are prevalent in our political environment.
Let us not forget our human rights, and be like workhorses that only work so as to be given their fodder.
Cast your vote with a conscience and look before before you leap. It is what makes us superior to the lower life forms of the animal kingdom.
Forget not, that we owe it to the younger generation - to guide them through the trials of nationhood, for a better future.

Let us not seek honour in conformity - Together, we can make a difference.

"
The human race's prospects of survival, were considerably better when we were defenceless against tigers, than they are today, when we have become defenceless against ourselves."
- Arnold J. Toynbee

Saturday, 23 February 2008

BLOGGERS AT THE POLLS!!!

"Voters don't decide issues, they decide who will decide issues." -George Will

Hafiz Noor Shams said...

Sorry if this comes as an intrusion but there is an effort to get as many bloggers as possible to blog about bloggers whom are running for public offices on one particular day. One blogger candidate per day.

Below is the list:


1. Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad (Friday, February 29)
2. Tony Pua (Saturday, March 1)
3. Elizabeth Wong (Sunday, March 2)
4. Jeff Ooi (Monday, March 3)
5. che’GuBard (Tuesday, March 4)


Please join! For more information, visit http://maddruid.com/?p=1563

23/02/08 15:05

Monday, 18 February 2008

A Curse in the Malaysians' Embrace.


Preface
"In the novel The Picture of Dorian Gray, Oscar Wilde describes an exceptionally handsome young man so captivating that he drew the awe-stricken adulation of a great artist. The artist asked him to be the subject of a portrait for he had never seen a face so attractive and so pure.
When the painting was completed, young Dorian became so enraptured by his own looks that he wistfully intoned how wonderful it would be if he could live any way he pleased but that no disfigurement of a lawless lifestyle would mar the picture of his own countenance. If only the portrait would grow old and he himself could remain unscathed by time and way of life. In Faustian style he was willing to trade his soul for that wish.
One day, alone and pensive, Dorian went up to the attic and uncovered the portrait that he had kept hidden for so many years, only to be shocked by what he saw. Horror, hideousness, and blood marred the portrait. The charade came to an end when the artist himself saw the picture.
It told the story. He pleaded with Dorian to come clean, saying, "Does it not say somewhere, 'Though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow'?"
But in a fit of rage to silence this voice of conscience, Dorian grabbed a knife and killed the artist.
There was now only one thing left for him to do; he took the knife to remove the only visible reminder of his wicked life. But the moment he thrust the blade into the canvas, the portrait returned to its pristine beauty, while Dorian lay stabbed to death on the floor.
The ravages that had marred the picture now so disfigured him that even his servants could no longer recognize him.
What a brilliant illustration of how a soul, though invisible, can nonetheless be tarnished. I wonder, if there were to be a portrait of my soul or your soul, how would it best be depicted? Does not the conscience sting, when we think in these terms? Though we have engineered many ways of avoiding physical consequences, how does one cleanse the soul? Today we find a limitless capacity to raise the question of evil as we see it outside ourselves, but often hold an equal unwillingness to address the evil within us." "
What do we do when we have committed a wrong that we are ashamed of? What can we do with those wrongful deeds that we can’t seem to erase from our consciences? One way that many people deal with guilt is to cover it up.
This can seem almost instinctive at times, as if something inside us says, “Hide it. Forget about it. No one can know.” But this puts us in a very precarious position, for not only are we dealing with guilt, but now we are dealing with the fear of being “found out.”
When we add fear to our feelings of guilt we are adding apprehension to the remorse we are struggling to conceal. Just as a blackmailer is never satisfied, so the one who lives in fear with guilt ends up blackmailing his or her own heart to pay the mind. But the heart is never consoled, for the mind is never sufficiently paid.
Guilt that is concealed seldom stops with the one who harbors that hurt. Sooner or later that pain of fear and guilt is spread to others, particularly to those closest to us. “Victimless” crimes are an illusion, for deceit is a monster that needs constant feeding. It would be foolish for us to think that we can deal with guilt by somehow covering it up.
The moment that we cover our guilt we escalate the tension in our lives by adding the dimension of fear. We may then become people who seem okay on the outside, but inside we are struggling to maintain the facade."
-Ravi Zacharias

---------------------------------------
Those were words of a philosopher/ Christian apologist I admire - Ravi Zacharias.
[For those who remember seeing a photo entitled "Priceless" in (of all people, the "tattoo-comedian") MENJ's online album, the grey-haired Indian guy in the jacket is the man himself.]
Ravi also said, "Carried to a different level, this same tendency underlies all our national preoccupation with one social or economic crisis after another. No one seems willing to admit that at the heart of our malady is a mangled spirituality."
For a small nation that should by right be striving for unity in pluralism and held fast by the secular spirit and principles of the constitution of 1957, Malaysia is a nation that is struggling silently through a turbulent time of social recronstruction - albeit in the wrong direction.

Indeed, what Ravi said rings very true if we were to reflect on his words against the backdrop of our woes, at the heart of which lies the greed and sectarian politics practised by our political masters. Here we do not have the luxury of "whacking" the usual bogeyman, the Government or BN (aka UMNO Baru).

No - all of them in the opposition too, practice the very same evil by embracing "race or religion" based politics - this has been the curse that has been handed down to us by those who refused to accept and thus betrayed the the ideals that Dato' Onn Jaafar, the Father of UMNO, stood for.
They instead killed every opportunity to build a nation based on "Values and Principles".
They preferred to play the race game that would be a short cut to power consolidated upon those politically "victorious", ie the Muslim Malay race.
That being the case, all the "others" also joined the bandwagon of the most primitive "race/ religion" political game.
YES - This is the curse that we inherited from certain idolised "leaders", who were actually the perpetrators of cardinal sins that would one day spell the doom of this nation (unless it is undone).

Political parties in Malaysia were never forged out of principles of the democracy that they all swore to protect and nurture - they were there simply to fight for the rights and "interests" of specific races/ religions.

As much as I believe that the Hindraf-5 (under the evil ISA now) had legitimate grouses, it is made difficult for me to reconcile myself to their struggle. This is simply becos they seek on the platform of a specific race and religion, which is exclusive in nature.
But of course, I realize that to support their cause is in my very own interest, as it is, in the interest of the nation as a whole. This being the case, I certainly hope "Hindraf" seeks to be more inclusive and address their grouses with other minority communities as well, so as to lend their platform a more "universal" appeal.
Is it "Justice" that they seek? Is it "Justice" for them to fight for only their interests?

Due credit for their resoluteness in capturing the imagination (although in dramatic fashion) and creating the awareness of the "not so subtle" persecution that is perpetrated by "leaders", among at least a certain sector of society. It would be good if Mr. Uthayakumar and Mr. Waythamoorthy could broaden his agenda so as to serve all Malaysians, regardless race, color or creed. For them to deny others their passion and fervour in upholding human rights would be an injustice in itself.
By playing the race and religion card, by restricting the ability of many (less politically "conscious") Malaysians to identify themselves with this very significant struggle for empowerment, freedom of worship and a share of the economic pie, they have played along with the game of divide and rule that is being practiced by the powers that be.

While they went to great lengths to highlight their problems, they have conveniently chosen to neglect those of the other downdrodden masses. Don't the others matter at all in their equation?
I believe that they should, and that a common platform should be sought for all religions and races. Moreover, they have never made a concrete stand on deciding on the leadership factor, for "fear of rejection" - Hindraf shouldn't be ambivalent on such matters when it is obvious that they have been let down by the relevant politicians, as it reflects a conflict of sorts which could be perceived as a "weakness".

Would it not serve Malaysian interests well if our politicians seek to emulate their selfless struggle against injustice under tyrants and religious extremists?
How I wish I could hear the music of politicians shouting out against the subtle persecutions against the all Malaysians be they Muslim, Christian, Hindu, Buddhists or Animists, be they of BN or the Opposition.

But No - they only do it so long as it serves their greedy, sectarian or racist political agenda. Listen to the sound of silence among members of one "party", when rights of the the other is trampled upon - it is so deafening, that you are tempted to doubt the legitimacy of your rights!
They believe that it isn't their struggle, unless it involves their "own people". Politicians fear "breaking ranks" with party bosses, even if it means betraying fellow Malaysians that they have sworn to speak for - all in the interest of "party unity".
How low can politicians go - they prefer to toe the party line and be subservient to "great leaders" and be slaves of the party, rather than stand up for truth and righteousness.

Dear friends, it is a grave sin indeed for one to dance to the tune of divisive and sectarian politics that caters to primitive, selfish and narrow interests of only certain communities. We need to change our minset to support leaders who aren't slaves to the dictatorial party leadership, but to principles of humanity.
For that to happen we need to make a concerted effort to change the mindset of all Malaysians, so as to be able to regard his neighbour as a brother/ sister first - race , religion, beliefs, creed, class and whatever divisive factor shouldn't figure in the equation.
For that to happen, the small-minded "leaders" who bark in Parliament need to realize that all parties need to "overhaul" their constitutions so as to be inclusive, and practice it in word and deed.

Allow me to rephrase G.K Chesterton - "What we need is a Leadership that is not only right where we are right, but right where we are wrong".
Let us make up for the betrayal that our forefathers meted out to the Founding Fathers of the Nation
Let us all discard our insecurities, pride, prejudice and embrace instead principles of humanity, so that we may not live in fear, but in hope.
Let us turn not opt for the same fate as Dorian Gray, who chose to destroy the hideousness of the painting (of himself) that he saw,
and had unwittingly stabbed himself.
Most of you would say that it is just a pipe-dream - maybe so.
But until and unless this can be done, Malaysia is headed for further conflict among the various groups.
This may of course be conveniently averted with the use of "Rule by Draconian laws" by a dictator, wherein every citizen has to give up his/ her rights, in the interest of "maintaining law and order", with the interest of society at large - which is incidently the "Asian Value" that was sold to us by some "great leaders".

"It will not do to cling to the cause and wish the result away. Reality does not play mind games. What is more, to anesthetize the mind in order to abort what comes to birth when wrong ideas are conceived and borne in the womb of culture, will only kill the very life-giving force of the nation that nurtures the idea. We must learn, in the words of one cultural commenter, to live as wise as serpents and as innocent as doves." -Ravi Zacharias

Saturday, 9 February 2008

Religious Politics - Seeds of Fascism?

"The more the two sides try and call attention to their religious differences by slaughtering each other, the less there is to distinguish them from one another. They worship at the same altar. They're both apostles of the same murderous god, whoever he is .........
Right now we're sipping from a poisoned chalice: a flawed democracy laced with religious fascism. Pure arsenic.
What shall we do? What can we do?
We have a ruling party that's haemorrhaging”.

- (Arundhati Roy, Democracy and Religious Fascism)


Most people go about their daily lives actually just interested in “making a living” or simply enjoying “life” in a society. They actually don't “believe” in any ideology.

In fact many of them are simply “good people” who don't care much for all the indoctrination that is provided for by religious institutions or political establishments.


For most, it is just a matter of “fitting in” with the ruling sentiments, and nothing more They just play along with the mass psychosis that grips the “silent majority” at the behest of the bold and vocal minority. They don't really care, and would just want to move on with life - make a living, make babies, provide for the family, have some fun, have grand-children, grow old and die happily .....


These groups - and this means the "virtuous, silent majority" are the ones who unwittingly partake in the success of any idea that would actually determine the fate of the nation. These "virtuous and silent majority", who are apparently innocent when the vociferous and bold minority shame their faith, are the ones who are actually to be blamed for allowing evils to be perpetrated in the name of "God", by the politicians who seek to consolidate their power.


Of late, one of the most potent tools for fomenting division, sectarianism, distrust and insecurity that has been used is religion, politicised. Words like Christo-Fascism, Islamo-Fascism, Hindutva and many more are becoming increasingly common.

This is quite obvious with the high-handedness of many a religious bodies and ridiculous court decisions (in Malaysia, and also worldwide), that have been quite controversial to say the least, sparking debate in the international media.


While the relevant Christian institutions insist on “values” and often stop short of calling for a theocracy, many Muslim groups don't mince their words in demanding for it.

Some scholars consider Christian Reconstructionism a quasi-fascist movement because it is explicitly opposed to religious liberty and human rights. Berlet and Lyons have witten that the movement is a "new form of clerical fascist politics."(Right-Wing Populism in America, p. 249) Karen Armstrong sees a potential for fascism in Christian Reconstructionism, and claims that the system of dominion envisaged by Christian Reconstructionist theologians R. J. Rushdoony and Gary North is totalitarian: "There is no room for any other view or policy, no democratic tolerance for rival parties, no individual freedom." (Armstrong, Battle for God, pp. 361-362).


The creation of a centralized authoritarian state to enforce blanket obedience to a reactionary, all-encompassing ideology — fits well the aims of contemporary Islamism that openly demands implementation of sharia law and the return to a Pan-Islamic and theocratic caliphate. In addition, Islamists, as is true of all fascists, privilege their own particular creed of true believers by harkening back to a lost, pristine past, in which the devout were once uncorrupted by modernism.


The same goes for the advocates of the Hindutva/ Sangh Parivar movements.

Marxist critics have used the political epithets of "Indian fascism" and "Hindu fascism" to describe the ideology of the Sangh Parivar. For example, Marxist social scientist Prabhat Patnaik has written that the Hindutva movement as it has emerged is "classically fascist in class support, methods and programme".


Envy and false grievances, as in the past with Italian, German, or Japanese whining, are always imprinted deeply within the fascist mind. After all, it can never quite figure out why the morally pure, the politically zealous, the ever more obedient are losing out to corrupt and decadent democracies — where “mixing,” either in the racial or religious sense, should instead have enervated the people.

In all these groups there is an element of insecurity – real or imagined - imposed upon their indoctrinated followers. Most of these groups tend to gravitate towards ideas that are repressive, ethnic and nationalistic under an authoritarian rule, oblivious to its consequences on their civil liberties. Many find it quite convenient to give up their “faculties” and rights to the wiser men of the cloth (or corporations), who would in turn tell them what God has ordained!


According to Wikipaedia,

Fascism is an authoritarian political ideology (generally tied to a mass movement) that considers the individual subordinate to the interests of the state, party or society as a whole. Fascists seek to forge a type of national unity, usually based on (but not limited to) ethnic, cultural, racial, religious attributes. Various scholars attribute different characteristics to fascism, but the following elements are usually seen as its integral parts: nationalism, statism, militarism, totalitarianism, anti-communism, corporatism, populism, collectivism, autocracy and opposition to political and economic liberalism .

Dr. Lawrence Britt having examined the fascist regimes of Hitler (Germany), Mussolini (Italy), Franco (Spain), Suharto (Indonesia) and several Latin American regimes, found 14 defining characteristics common to each:


1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism

2. Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights

3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause
4. Supremacy of the Military
5. Rampant Sexism
6. Controlled Mass Media
7. Obsession with National Security
8. Religion and Government are Intertwined
9. Corporate Power is Protected
10. Labor Power is Suppressed
11. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts
12. Obsession with Crime and Punishment
13. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption
14. Fraudulent Elections


Fascism feeds on ignorance and fear. These are two very prominent characteristics seen in many insecure, fearful, conservative, orthodox, religious and cloistered societies that are often deprived of civil liberties.

Hitler's Reichmarshall Hermann Goering declared that "people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. This is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and attack the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country."


On the religion side of things apocalyptic theology is booming, leading to the “fear factor” that draws the gullible faithful to their pastors, gurus and mullahs, giving rise to many a pseudo-religious revival that appeals to the “emotional emptiness” of the faithful sheep – many a time with devastating consequences. This theology of despair "fits" our current culture of powerlessness and fear.


In Muslim nations worldwide, there is a significant amount of unrest created by Jihadi ideologies that advocate injustice and atrocities in order to bring about “God's Will” on earth. Where they are minorities, many resort to religion inspired insurgency, in order to make their presence felt, leading to devastation. Any injustice is legitimized in the name of Islam, so as to advance the agendas of the relevant groups that seek political dominance.


In America, we see a very powerful Christian Evangelical lobby that have influences many a policy that the government makes.

A top Bush aide actually told the New York Times' Ron Suskind that administration officials disparagingly dismiss what they call "the reality-based community"---specifically, people who "believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality" as irrelevant. "That's not the way the world really works anymore," he declared. "We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality---judiciously, as you will---we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors. . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do."


In other words, truth is for wimps; forget about it. We are the champions, the powerful, we make it up as we go along and if you want a piece of it, embrace the delusion. (Gary Leupp, Everybody's Talkin' About Christian Fascism)



NOTE:
This article is mainly a "cut and paste" job from numerous other articles. It is regretted that references cannot be made available.