Thursday, 5 February 2009

No Dissolution of Perak Assembly! Nizar told to Quit! Impending Emergency??

This is so "cool" ....
we now have a mercenary
B ... Perak government!!

Long Live Soldiers of Fortune!!

Malaysia Boleh!!

PS:
We do not know what His Majesty's reasons are, but we shall abide (at least I would).
This is a challenge to the people's mandate, though .... as those who crossed over did it against the will of their electorate, and hence, have no moral justification to hold their seats.
No matter what His Majesty's reasons may be, it actually worsens the political climate in the country. It has been a divisive decision.
It has created plenty of "bad blood" between the people and the BN hierarchy which holds the Federal Government which disregards Democracy, by abusing the office of the Election Commission.

Anyway, I'm just waiting to see how they gonna handle it when push comes to shove".
The trend in the past was for Emergency to be declared in states where the "hard-up" want to "piratize" and "privatize" the Government into "fiefdoms".

Some enactments that have yet to be repealed, is a testimony to this ......

Allow a Mercenary Govt, despite its Apparent Strength?

#########################
"God grant me the serenity
to accept the things I cannot change;

courage to change the things I can;

and wisdom to know the difference. "


************************************

In his book "Constitutional Monarchy, Rule of Law and Good Governance" (2004),
the former Lord President wrote:
"Under normal circumstances,
it is taken for granted that the Yang di-Pertuan Agong
would not withhold his consent to a request for dissolution of parliament.
His role is purely formal."
........................................................

On 8-3-2008, the rakyat decided unanimously that they did not want a BN Government in Perak. Although "legally speaking", they voted for individuals, they did not vote for individuals per se - because these individuals were practically unknown to them. They were voted in simply for one reason - they wanted BN out, and they wanted a Pakatan Rakyat Govt.

Moreover, these individuals stood on the platform of good governance (on a Party banner) that opposed the subversive tactics of certain other parties. These deserters hence, have lost all remnants of legitimacy they might have had when their allegiance to the ideals of Pakatan Rakyat was put to doubt, when they denied their association with their supposed nemeses.
These traitors have now turned their backs on His Majesty's Government, after taking an OATH of LOYALTY.

Now, "Somebody" (withe help of these traitors/mercenaries to His Majesty's Government) wants to install an illegitimate government which consists of political mercenaries, which may subject the people of Perak to "retribution" for rejecting them in the first place.
"Somebody" is attempting to show that he can be ruthless, shameless and that he dares to disregard public opinion and voter sentiment in search of legitimacy & power.

Najib is apparently in Audience with HM Sultan Azlan Shah, who was our Lord President prior to becoming the Sultan of Perak. Despite his claims that there was no money involved, we are all aware how hollow his credibility is, after the numerous "events" that were linked to him.

Tuanku,
My humble Apologies for not using court language - I plead that you make your decision taking into consideration the feelings and opinions of your subjects, as your legacy and the future of the nation will depend on your wisdom.

Let us Pray and Hope that God grants His Majesty the Wisdom and Courage,
to defend a nation in Distress, and the State/ People of Perak -
from "Soldiers of Fortune", Pirates and Political Prostitution.
==========================================

Related:
  • The Star- Newsflash (12:30pm)
  • IGP Tan Sri Musa Hassan warns of stern action against Pakatan Rakyat supporters who take part in illegal gatherings in Ipoh
  • From MalaysiaKini:
  • Sultan agrees to 'unity' gov't led by BN?
    Feb 5, 09 10:25am
  • LIVE REPORTS Sultan Azlan Shah has indicated in his separate meetings with the three independents that he may approve of a 'unity' government headed by the BN.MORE

  • Perak Umno meeting at noon

    Pakatan goes to court

Wednesday, 4 February 2009

BN Grabs the Silver State's "Jewels"!!!

To all who read the earlier post, I apologize for it - but it was what Astro Awani reported.
Thanks to Najib and his Umno/BN buddies ...........

I was never one for this image above image of the flag, because I believed (once) that weren't "there" yet. Well, times change, people change, and as such, depending on circumstances, opinions change as well.

It was heartbreaking to see the smug look on Najib, who was blushing & beaming so shamelessly over this travesty of justice, while making his press statement. He either doesn't realize that it makes him hated even more than ever, or just doesn't give a rat's ass for the feelings of the electorate. I'd bet on the latter, rather than the former anyways.
He however, has yet to meet DYMM Sultan Azlan Shah (officially, at least). Hopefully His Highness is aware that the legacy and reputation he leaves behind hinges on this one decision he'll be making.

BN definitely has manged to subvert the politics of Perak, used the EC to overrule the Speaker of the State Assembly, and used "very convincing" methods to win over traitors to the cause. The face of the DAP rep probably speaks volumes ....

If the assembly is dissolved, the decision of which has been deferred, one can't help wondering if Perakians love having their "Jewels" fondled or held in a vice grip by "U-know-Who".
Let's hope that all these wouldn't lead to any trouble ......

Tomorrw, there will be a Program Munajat dan Perhimpunan Rakyat Menyokong MB Perak Dato Seri Nizar, at 7pm at the MB's residence. It is hoped that Perakians will give their full support at this event.

God Bless Malaysia - she's definitely in Distress!!

ASSEMBLY DISSOLVED - ELECTIONS IN PERAK!!!

ON ASTRO AWANI:
MB DATO SERI NIZAR ANNOUNCED THAT THE STATE ASSEMBLY IS DISSOLVED - EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY!!
PERAK WILL BE HAVING ELECTIONS, AND GIVING UMNO/BN A RUN FOR THEIR MONEY!!


NOW LETS SEE HOW DEEP THE POCKETS ARE - WHAT MORE, WITH THE UMNO "ELECTIONS" COMING UP. IT WILL BE REAL FUN TO WATCH HOW THEY HANDLE THEMSELVES NOW .....

MY ONLY WORRY IS THE POTENTIAL OF "ACTIVITIES" WHICH MAY BE TRIGGERED BY CERTAIN "SUBVERSIVES" WHO MAY BE OUT OF POWER - THESE GUYS WORK BY DESTABILIZING THE COUNTRY, SO THAT THEY CAN "NECESSITATE" AN EMERGENCY, AND SUSPEND PARLIAMENT ......

THIS TIME, UMNO IS GONNA BITE THE DUST - REAL BAD- IN PERAK .....

Tuesday, 3 February 2009

DISSOLVE THE PERAK STATE ASSEMBLY, NIZAR!!!

UPDATE: Jamaluddin quits PKR to be independent
Here's a song dedicated to Mr. Jamaludin who probably hasn't lost
the "art of delivering to various destinations" since his postman days ...

Perak gives 48 hour ultimatum for EC to reverse decision

EC: No by-election for Behrang, Changkat Jering

With the Bota crossover, the PR Govt of Perak survives on a wafer-thin majority of a single seat. The BN, having an extremely large war-chest with their ill-gotten wealth, can now up the ante, to grab a few more "independants" to their side.

The PR meanwhile will be faced with a war of attrition which will wear down the confidence of this fledgling electoral pact, and severely test the loyalties of the representatives.
The shaky Perak Government needs more credibility to govern, if they want to make a real difference - or they'll only make fools of themselves throughout the coming term.
With the "instruments of state" practically waging war on them, they would be severely disadvantaged, in governing. Moreover, should they not perform their role well ( and it is certain that that they cannot), the odds will be stacked against them in the next elections, come 2012.

Hope PR sees the benefits of a dissolving the assembly, as opposed to holding on to a shaky Govt, while being suckers for "crossovers" - or even maybe even getting suckered real soon.
This election would also irreversibly dent (maybe even punch deep holes) NTR's already tattered credibility in the upcoming "transition" in the Umno-BN feudal/fascist regime.
Perak is a "feather in the cap" which NTR desperately needs to shore up his "image".
The only way to beat him in his game is to call for a new round of elections!!

So I hope Nizar/Anwar/LKS/Hadi do the right thing
- Dissolve the Assembly!!

To Those Rendered "Ambivalent" about ISA By DSP Ong ....

*****************************************************
“Fear always springs from ignorance”
-Ralph Waldo Emerson

"It will not do to cling to the cause and wish the result away.
Reality does not play mind games.
What is more, to anesthetize the mind in order to abort what comes to birth
when wrong ideas are conceived and borne in the womb of culture,
will only kill the very life-giving force of the nation that nurtures the idea."
- Ravi Zacharias
*********************************************
Lately there have been some posts by bloggers who appear to have been able to "understand" the "need" for the ISA, and now start asking that the ISA simply "not be abused". Thanks to DSP Ong for that. He must have been pretty convincing in his argument for "Fear & Ignorance", and it makes me wish I was there to talk with him at Lotus last Sunday (but of course, I saw him there & walked away, as he was just "doing his job" with Del Capo and others).
PatLu posted "No to ISA or Stop Abusing the ISA?" , and DelCapo posted "PJ Candle light vigil - sbotted" to express their opinions. The "soft touch" & TLC of PDRM appear to be making some inroads - or so it seems ... but then again, it may have just been a "PR" exercise by PatLu & DelCapo.
So, here's to you guys, and others who might be ambivalent about it:-

It's sad, and I find it strange that some of you guys have changed your stance from "No ISA" to "Stop Abusing The ISA", after just one conversation with a "security personnel".
There is however a certain level of "ambivalence", I notice.
Maybe it was the "convincing arguments" brought about in the discussions with DSP Ong .... and the fact that he has managed to impress his ignorance upon others quite well, based on the "fear" factors which are used to justify it. Contrary to what many believe, it isn't the batons and bullets that is their greatest weapon against the people - It is this "fear factor"!

Believe me - I understand those sentiments quite well, for I once belonged to that boat. However, after an online "debate" with RPK, months of thought and much writing to articulate them, the "spins" and feeble excuses (not "reasons", okay) from the "security personnel"/politicians (and staged events of the past) don't convince me - not one bit, that it is necessary!
What we need is education and accountability - not laws to "keep the peace". Without the former, we end up with goons to fill in the places of intellectuals who should be running the country. What we are experiencing today in Malaysia is the result of "anti-intellectualism" that has been in practise since the 80s, and I'll bet on it that 75% of the lawmakers in office don't know the Federal Constitution.
It is for this very reason that we see the current crop of leaders who shamelessly flout the Federal Constitution with impunity, and find supporters among rakyat.

I'll try to make it simple - no amount of legislation or security personnel will guarantee you the "safety" which they promise, through these "violations" of fundamental human rights. A society that lives in fear and ignorance knows no "Law", nor do they respect or understand the need for it. In fact, they also don't know their rights, and hence make demands or do things that are "deemed acceptable" by those in authority. This sets the stage for open conflict, and hence the "the need" for laws that strip them of their rights.
Do you see the pattern/series of events for ISA/Police Act to make itself "necessary" and unaccountable?

The ISA, is the ISA - the same can be said of the Police Act. It was assured by our early leaders (Razak), that it would be abused, and only used on "insurgents & terrorist" prevalent at that time. However, the "sunset clause" as with all other forms of "restrictions have been deliberately left out so as to enable it to be used "subject to interpretation".
With the "modifications" that you might suggest, they aren't what we oppose anymore.

The issue here isn't just the ISA, actually - it also encompasses the Police Act, which is unconstitutional and violates the tenets of fundamental human rights.
There will be plenty of arguments for the "ISA" based on speculation & presumption. DSP Ong must definitely be an intelligent man - wish I had the opportunity to spend some time with him the other day.
To those who are "ambivalent", I take it that you guys have read the Federal Constitution and the ISA 1960/ Police Act 1967 in full against the backdrop of Universal Declaration of Human Rights ......
Maybe when somebody is arrested for eating "kuaci" at Lotus - an act that might be deemed a "threat to national seciruty" for whatever reason by our HM, you might understand that it is a law that begs to be abused.

Cheers, guys!
****************************************

Sunday, 1 February 2009

Zahid Hamidi - Enlighten Yourself!!!


$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
“Don’t play with fire and challenge the Muslims.
We are willing to do anything to protect our religion.”

- Zahid Hamidi
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Lately, I had a discussion with a casual acquaintance (who I later learnt, was an Ustaz who teaches tafsir Al-Qur'an) .... Just in case "someone" decides to ask, sorry- I don't recollect his name.
I asked him if Muslims actually understood what they read, when they learned to read & recited the Qur'an. His very frank reply actually took me by surprise - he claimed that many actually "fear to understand the words they read, lest they misinterpret & and are damned for it". So, to "solve the problem", they apparently leave it to the ulama to do the job of interpreting/ understanding it - and very few actually bother to read translations!!!
This sounds exactly like what RPK said some time back, when he wrote quite a bit about "muslim" behavioural patterns in Malaysia - but of course, it was often regarded as "insulting Islam" by the likes of many an Umno warlord ...

Now - Zahid claims that the Christians have been "challenging" the Muslims!!
Isn't this the most ignorant thing to come out of one who claims to be a leader? That too, one that claims to be doing it to "defend" Islam!!

Zahid can shove his "fire" up where the sun don't shine, for all I care - it may provide some enlightenment, presuming that it's where his grey matter resides ....

While many of those of other religions know quite a bit about Islam and make efforts to learn more about Islam, its philosophy, culture & mores, how much has the UMNO?BN government done to learn & understand about other religions & their history?
As far as I know, they've done little or none - and it is this ignorance that we see people like Hamid Albar & Zahid Hamidi shamelessly advertizing with such boldness!! It is people like these that give a very bad image for Islam & Muslims in general.

As far as I know even the Prophet Mohamed (pbuh) said that "people of the book" worship ALLAH! (Correct me if I'm wrong).
It appears that Umno disputes this fact!!

How come BN hypocrites/munafiqs are making pronouncements on this issue?
Isn't it "SUB-JUDICE" to do so?
They were so good at not commenting on other issues becos it was "sub-judice" - why is it okay now?
Shouldn't they be reprimanded by the courts?

BN is so hard up for some conflict in Malaysia that they stir up religious sentiments out of nothing.
They just wanna show that they are the so-called "defenders of Islam".
They want to suspend Parliament a la 513, and impose emergency. The corrupt aristocrats of Umno are unable to change their ways, and seek to perpetuate their plunder by taking away rights, & imposing greater control over the people.

The houses of worship are the last bastions of freedom for the people - Umno has succesfully trampled on every other institution and have managed to control & corrupt them!

Rest assured, BN - if you insist on provoking Sikhs & Christians with this Allah issue, they will be campaigning hard against you (along with all other regardless of race & religion in PAS, DAP & PKR) till the next GE, and till UMNO is dead & gone!!
Not that they wouldn't otherwise - but at least there will be room to doubt that this will occur, if they refrain from their politics of racism, religious bigotry, fear & intimidation.

As much as I'd like to, maybe I shouldn't say what the Holy Qur'an says about this - lest I offend some people like Hamid or Zahid. So,Below is an article on this issue, which was written under the supervision of Sheikh Salman B. Fahd Al-Qadah

God's Name: Non-Muslims Calling the Creator "Allah"
Prepared by the Research Committee of IslamToday


The name "Allah" is the Arabic word that refers to the one true God who created the heavens and the Earth – the God of all the Prophets from Adam to Noah to Abraham to Moses to Jesus to Muhammad (peace be upon them all).

The word Allah comes from the Arabic word “ilâh” meaning “deity, god, divine being” combined with the definite article “al”. Put together, they make “al-Ilâh” or literally “the God” which is then elided together as “Allah”.

Essentially, "Allah" is the literal Arabic equivalent to the English word "God" with a capital "G" while the Arabic word "ilâh" is the literal equivalent of the English word "god" with a lower-case "g".

The Qur'ân uses the name Allah consistently when referring to the message of all of the prophets and to the various beliefs of all of the people.

Even when the Qur'ân quotes people of other religions saying false things about the Creator of the Heavens and the Earth, the word Allah is used.

We have, for example, where certain Jews are quoted as saying: "And the Jews say: 'The hand of Allah is tied up!' Their hands shall be shackled, and may they be cursed for what they say. Nay, both His hands are spread out, He bestows as He pleases." [Sûrah al-Mâ'idah: 64]

We have the Christian doctrine of the trinity conveyed in the following verse: "They surely disbelieve who say: 'Lo! Allah is the third of three' when there is no god but the One Allah. If they desist not from so saying a painful doom will fall on those of them who disbelieve." [Sûrah al-Mâ'idah: 73]

We also have in the Qur'ân: "And the Jews say: 'Ezra is the son of Allah', and the Christians say: 'The Messiah is the son of Allah'." [Sûrah al-Tawbah: 30]

These verses are in Arabic and use the Arabic name Allah. The fact that the Qur'ân does not shy away from using this word even when it speaks about the falsehood of the people of unbelief shows that the name "Allah" is truly universal, and can be used by anyone to refer to the true Creator of the heavens and the Earth.

The Prophet (peace be upon him) always referred to God as Allah when he discussed the beliefs of the Jews and Christians with him. They did so as well.

We have the challenge between the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) to the Christians of Najran about their false belief in the divinity of Christ. The Arabs of Najran were Arab and were certainly speaking Arabic.

We read in the Qur'ân where Allah commands His Messenger: “If any one disputes in this matter with thee, now after (full) knowledge hath come to thee, Say: Come! Let us gather together, our sons and your sons, our women and your women, ourselves and yourselves: then let us earnestly pray. And invoke the curse of Allah on those who lie.” [Sûrah Âl-`Imrân: 61]

The people of Arabia all referred to the Creator of the heavens and the Earth as "Allah", whether they were Jews, Christians, or pagans. This is the reason why, in pre-Islamic times, many people of all three faiths already carried the name `Abd Allah.

They included the Prophet's father `Abd Allah b. `Abd al-Muttalib who died before the Prophet (peace be upon him) was born, as well as the Prophet's cousin `Abd Allah b. Abî Umayyah who only accepted Islam shortly before the conquest of Mecca.

They included the prominent Jewish rabbi of Madinah, `Abd Allah b. Salâm, who became one of the most eminent of the Prophet's Companions. Of course, he had been given the name `Abd Allah by his Jewish family long before Islam.

The measures that have recently been taken in some countries to bar non-Muslims from referring to God as "Allah" in their religious publications are quite unfortunate. The publications is question are ones written in languages where the name used for the Creator of the heavens and the Earth is the name "Allah".

The purpose behind these restrictive measures is the fear that those publications will confuse Muslims who speak those languages and who might read those publications. Be that as it may, the confusion on a global scale which is being caused by the restriction is far worse.

Islamic workers who try convey the message of Islam to Jews and Christians have been struggling against the widely held belief idea that the god of the Muslims is some exotic deity other than the one who sent Abraham, Moses, and Jesus (peace be upon them all). It has been a long and uphill effort. These recent measures in some countries to ban non-Muslims form using the name Allah have resulted in confirming and entrenching those false suspicions among non-Muslims.

It is the duty of Muslims today to redouble their efforts to teach the people of the world that there is only one true God who created the heavens and the Earth; that all of the prophets and messengers were sent by Him with the same essential teaching: to worship the Creator alone and not set up partners with Him; that Allah is the God of Noah, Abraham, Moses, Jesus– and Muhammad (peace be upon them all).

And Allah knows best.
=====================================

So Zahid - go shove your "fire" .....