Monday, 30 August 2010

53 Yrs On - What comes to mind this "Merdeka" ......

“We are going to showcase something different this year.
There will be no cultural performances-
instead we are going to focus on performance by the armed forces and police.”

-Culture and Arts Director-General Norliza Rofli

“It (national flag) is not expensive- cheaper than a pack of cigarettes.
If cost is a problem, we can supply them”
(adding that this year the giving away of the flags for free was limited because the government wanted to see for itself the people’s response to the flag flying campaign)

-Rais Yatim
===============================

This year once again, we'll be having the anniversary of our so-called "independence" from the British empire on the 31st of August. Apparently Umno "fought" for "Independence" lah ... at least that is the urban (or is it kampung) legend/myth which has been drummed into Malaysians year in, year out.
The heroic nationalism of Umno stalwarts had determined the freedom which we enjoy now..... the "scrifices" of Umno Malay leaders got us all we have - "tanah tumpah darah ku". all the rest were traitors, and they were rightfully incarcerated by the colonial masters prior to independence under the Emergency Ordinance), and by Umno (under the Police Act & the ISA) thereafter.

This will be the 53rd consecutive "celebration" of the Umno rule - of course, under the Barisan Nasional flag (after the "Perikatan"/Alliance flopped in 1969 after the post-513 internal coup within Umno). In other words, it will be a celebration of Umno Rule, wherein no "opposition" leaders would be invited as guests of honour.
MIC, MCA, Gerakan, PBS, LDP, PBB, UPKO, and all the other submissive pirates in arms standing in the front row to honour the master - UMNO.
Meanwhile, we have fascist, religious bigots, racists and morons among the supporters of the ruling elite of UMNO, running wild - telling others that they're 2nd class citizens or even telling them to leave their country if they don't like UMNO policies of Ketuanan Melayu ..... and our Mr 1-Malaysia with his "Zero-Tolerance" maintains his "elegant silence".

So this year, the "celebration" will be only with the participation of "defence" (only God knows what they "defend" us from- but I hear, it is actually defending Umno from Malaysians) forces .... nice!! Apparently, being the Ramadan - they wanna have it all on a moderate scale .... yes - I'm sure the "moderate" celebration will include rental of canopies & tents for the "security" personnel, as in a certain by-election some time ago.

As for the flags which are supposed to be given out for free - Rais's claim of it being "limited because the government wanted to see for itself the people’s response" - my @$$ ...... I'd rather speculate that (in the Umno/NEP spirit), Ramadan or not, somebody made a hefty profit from undelivered goods, and is laughing to the bank while celebrating "Merdeka!!".

Anyway, that's "peanuts" compared to what I'd worry about ......
This "Merdeka", my mind will be on the
"booming" 10% growth economy,
increasing cost of living,
my shitty ASTRO subscription,
the even shittier lying mainstream media,
flight of capital,
numerous toll booths on our roads,
ISA,
OSA,
UUCA,
PPPA,
Police Act,
DDA,
Sedition Act,
NEP (include NEM, NKRA, KPI, PEMANDU and whatever crap)
PKFZ,
MAS,
Petronas,
Sime Darby,
MARA,
FELDA,
FELCRA,
Scorpene,
Sukhoi,
missing jetfighter engines
(and missing God-knows what else),
PWTC,
BMF,
Sarawak rain forests,
Penans,
Petroleum royalties,
Bakun,
Kugan,
the fascists in UMNO,
Perkasa's "Bangsa Ketuanan",
illegals with citizenship,
Pendatangs,
Perak's lost democracy,
Mahathir's racist "meritocracy",
Umno's bribing Chief Justice Zaki,
Sarawak's Taib Mahmud,
the illegals & the Rape of Sabah,
Proton,
Altantuya,
and of course ..... Teoh Beng Hock.

Yes, yes of course- I'm mighty proud to be "Malaysian" under the stinking yoke of Umno's NEP piracy .... and this is the picture that comes to mind:-

Saturday, 14 August 2010

"MERDEKA" or Police State By Design?

"It makes this country a complete police State......
Independence without freedom is an empty independence,
because the people of this land fought for their freedom,
fought for their independence, so that they will be free.
They did not fight for independence so that they become unfree,
so that they become slaves of the police."
- Enche' Karam Singh, MP for Damansara, Debate on ISA 21st June,1960

**********************************************************


The above quote was what one parliamentarian said despite the verbose aand empty assurances from the then DPM abdul Razak, in his speech when the dreaded ISA was being debated.
But that is what has happened - today, we as an "Independent nation" have "fought to give up our freedoms"!!
Let's be honest about it, guys - we were stupid to surrender our freedoms to a bunch of thugs in Gucci suits, and we are about to celebrate it this 31st of August!!!
Despite much opposition from Onn Jaafar and Ahmad Boestamam, Dato' Dr Ismail conveniently, had this to say (since he was not to see the damage) in the debate:-

“In parliamentary democracy the powers given to the Government are the powers
given by the majority of the people in the country, and no government worthy of its name ... will dare to abuse these powers so long as parliamentary democracy exists......
I say, let these powers be abused, and you will see how
the people in the country will rise against it.”

-Dato' Dr Ismail, Minister of External Affairs, Debate on ISA, 21st June, 1960


ROTFLOL - " ....and you will see how the people in the country will rise against it."

The shameless audacity of that statement, after depriving us of our liberties!! That's like asking the crowd not to laugh at the amputee at the starting line of a 100m dash, after breaking his legs personally!!!
Yes - how convenient .... some call it "visionary", others, "prophetic" - while applauding his (Tun Dr. Ismail's) "principled politics". Maybe he was justified personally back then - simply beacause he was just too naive (and I don't believe that!!) to know that there would one day be one man who was not so honorable & "Malay" in breeding (yes- you and I know who that "one man" is), as he thought the future leaders of Umno would have been.
And so it happened - that the despicable and unconstitutional law called the ISA came to be passed by the parliament.


Today, after 25yrs of Mahathirism, and the the persistant efforts of the racists under his patronage, the worst nightmares of the parliamentarians of the 1960s have come true - we have given up the "Merdeka" which our forefathers had strived to create in their trade-off with the Brits.


I state once again - they had a "trade-off" and not a "fight" - in achieving our independence.
This was simply because the great power of the WW II - the US of A, demanded that trade barriers be brought down throughout the British Empire, and that the Straits of Melaka be freed for their shipping routes - and a bankrupt Britain was in no position to say "No". Then the invasion on the beaches of Normandy happened - and the rest is history ..... and with the spilling of American & British blood on the beaches of Normandy, the "fight" about which the "Hidup Melayu" pariahs of Umno talk about was "won" .... and voila - we had "Merdeka"!!!


It seemed to me for some time that Umno itself was a creation of the Brits, with the help of chronic flunkies (save Onn Jaafar, Razak & Ismail) among the Malay aristocracy/elite MCKK boys who were "groomed for leadership". The rest who aspired for leadership, were systematically filtered out in the so-called Umno "elections" (which made a mockery of democracy).


Little do many know that this "Merdeka!" call was that of the leftists and the IMP of Onn Jaafar, which Umno had later hijacked.
This they (Umno) did by playing second fiddle to their Brit masters while the real fighters were shedding their blood in their struggle against the Brits.
Being small & less popular, they worked along with the Brits using the "Emergency Ordinance", and did all they could to suppress/arrest all activists who would not work with the British "Tuans". Anyone who was suspected to be "not supportive" of the ruling regime ( read, the British) was "filtered-out" with the excuse that he was "a threat". They mysteriously "happen to lose democratically" by wafer thin margins to the "blue-eyed elite boys" who were groomed at every Umno election ......
In return, the "grateful" tuans of the past passed the mantle of power to the new "Tuanship" in Umno.


Being nervous little new "Tuans", these guys needed certain laws to help them maintain their grip on power, while depriving the people of their freedoms in the pretext of "protecting their rights" - that's what ISA is all about today!!
Nothing more, nothing less ....


So now - With all the staged dramas in the Umno elections throughout the years, am I expected to believe that the early leaders of Umno (yes- "the reluctant politician", Tun Dr. Ismail himself included) were unaware of the possibility of the ISA being subjected to abuse when enacting it?
Did they actually believe that "Democracy is more than the ritual casting of a ballot at multi-party elections. True democracy involves participation by the people at all levels so that they have a voice in the discussions and decisions by which they are governed. But democracy must not only govern the political process, it should pervade all sphere of society, including economic and social life."?
I seriously doubt it.


It is the very same reason that keeps in place the 4 proclamations of emergencies, the enforcement of which has been crafted very well, designed to perpetuate the police state we are today.
The following is an excerpt from a Paper by Mr. Wong Hon Wai- The role of fundamental liberties in the evolution of Malaysia as a democratic society.(the original link is dead, but the full article may be read in the three parts of The ISA in Malaysia links given below):-

"However, the Constitution Amendment Act 1960 removed this highly desirable protective mechanism by providing that neither the Proclamation of Emergency nor the laws passed automatically lapse after two months. Instead, they remain in force indefinitely, until both Houses of Parliament pass annulling resolutions [9]

As the consequences of this 1960 amendment, there are 4 proclamations of Emergency that are still valid and in force today as none of them had been revoked or annulled [10].

The 4 proclamation of Emergency are

  1. Indonesian Confrontation (1964)
  2. Political crisis in Sarawak only (1966)
  3. Racial riot (1969)
  4. Political crisis in Kelantan only (1977)

They were well aware of it- Tunku, Razak, Ismail, Mahathir (although he apparently thought otherwise, since he was a smalltimer back then, and still afraid of relegation). Was it about "national security" as they say it was - I seriously doubt it, although that was what they said.
If it was about "national security", freedom and "communist terrorism", where then is the sunset clause? Why are these evil laws still in place?

This is definitely not about what they claim it is - It was about creating a Police State by design.
  • It was simply about "POWER" - the power to control the masses and the national coffers.
  • Period.
  • It was about perpetuating an elite oligarchy.
  • It was about having a subservient underclass, which is ignorant of their rights and humanity, while the plunder and rape goes on silently.
  • It's about a working class keeping up pretences of "prosperity" in driving their Proton/Kancil tin-cans, while they are squeezed of their financial lifeblood and their economic future through sub-standard education, religiosity, hidden taxes, cheap foreign labour, tolls, mega projects (the likes of BMF, PKFZ, Bakun, Proton, KLCC/Petronas Twin Towers), illegal immigrants (Sabah) etc etc etc. - in short, daylight Grand Theft by "heroes" of "Bangsa, Agama dan Negara".
  • It is about being able to perpetuate the evils of Racism under the patronage of Barisan Nasional.
  • It's about the elitist "Ketuanan Melayu" promoted by the shameless Perkasa who use the Pribumis to further their agenda of Kleptocracy under the guise of the NEP.

To top it all off and complete their grip on all Malaysians' lives, they have added on the likes of Police Act, UUCA, PPPA, OSA, DDA, Sedition Act and what not.

I end this post with Mr D.R. Seenivasagam's words in Parliament:-

"You pass this Bill, but remember that one day somebody else,
perhaps, not as democratic as you are, may be sitting on that very Bench;
and when that time comes you—perhaps not you
but the children of those who to-day support this Bill—will say
"My God! We regret the day we introduced this Bill into this House.”"
- Enche' D.R. Seenivasagam, MP for Ipoh, Debate on ISA, 21st June, 1960

How prophetic ......
There you have it, guys - that's MERDEKA for you!

==============================

Related:-

Saturday, 31 July 2010

Now let’s have a discussion — Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah

"It’s not “uber-liberal” to ask for an end to having politics, economic policy,
education policy and everything and the kitchen sink determined by race.
It’s called growing up.
Please resist the temptation to say Salam 1 malaysia, ....
or anything like that.
...... It’s embarrassing".

JULY 31 — Thank you for inviting me to speak with you. I am truly honoured. I have played some small role in the life of this nation, but having been on the wrong side of one or two political fights with the powers that be, I am not as close to the young people of this country as I would hope to be. History, and the 8 o’clock news, are written by the victors. In recent years the government’s monopoly of the media has been destroyed by the technology revolution.

You could say I was also a member of the UKEC. Well I was, except that belonged to the predecessor of the UKEC by more than fifty years, The Malayan Students Union of the UK and Eire. I led this organisation in 1958/59. I was then a student of Queen’s University at Belfast, in a rather cooler climate than Kota Bharu’s.

Your invitation to participate in the MSLS was prefaced by an essay which calls for an intellectually informed activism. I congratulate you on this. The Youth of today, you note, “will chart the future of Malaysia.” You say you “no longer want to be ignored and leave the future of our Malaysia at the hands of the current generation.” You “want to grab the bull by the horns... and have a say in where we go as a society and as a nation.”I feel the same, actually. A lot of Malaysians feel the same. They are tired of being ignored and talked down to by swaggering mediocrities.

You are right. The present generation in power has let Malaysia down.

But also you cite two things as testimony of the importance of youth and of student activism to this country, the election results of 2008 and “the Prime Minister’s acknowledgement of the role of youth in the development of the country.”

So perhaps you are a little way yet from thinking for yourselves. The first step in “grabbing the bull by the horns” is not to required the endorsement of the Prime Minister, or any Minister, for your activism.

Politicians are not your parents. They are your servants. You don’t need a government slogan coined by a foreign PR agency to wrap your project in. You just go ahead and do it.

When I was a student our newly formed country was already a leader in the postcolonial world. We were sought out as a leader in the Afro-Asian Conference which inaugurated the Non-Aligned Movement and the G-77. The Afro-Asian movement was led by such luminaries as Zhou En-lai, Nehru, Kwame Nkrumah, Soekarno. Malaysians were seen as moderate leaders capable of mediating between these more radical leaders and the West. We were known for our moderation, good sense and reliability.

We were a leader in the Islamic world as ourselves and as we were, without our leaders having to put up false displays of piety. His memory has been scrubbed out quite systematically from our national consciousness, so you might not know this or much else about him, but it was Tengku Abdul Rahman established our leadership in the Islamic world by coming up with the idea of the OIC and making it happen.

Under his leadership Malaysia led the way in taking up the anti-apartheid cause in the Commonwealth and in the United Nations, resulting in South Africa’s expulsion from these bodies.

Here was a man at ease with himself, made it a policy goal that Malaysia be “a happy country”. He loved sport and encouraged sporting achievement among Malaysians. He was owner of many a fine race horse.

He called a press conference and had a beer with his stewards when his horse won at the Melbourne Cup. He had nothing to hide because his great integrity in service was clear to all. Now we have religious and moral hypocrites who cheat, lie and steal in office but never have a drink, who propagate an ideologically shackled education system for all Malaysians while they send their own kids to elite academies in the West.

Speaking of football. You’re too young to have experienced the Merdeka Cup, which Tunku started. We had a respectable side in the sixties and seventies. Teams from across Asia would come to play in Kuala Lumpur. Teams such as South Korea and Japan, whom we defeated routinely. We were one of the better sides in Asia. We won the Bronze medal at the Asian games in 1974 and qualified for the Moscow Olympics in 1980. Today our FIFA ranking is 157 out of 203 countries. That puts us in the lowest quartile, below Maldives (149), the smallest country in Asia, with just 400,000 people living about 1.5 metres above sea level who have to worry that their country may soon be swallowed up by climate change. Here in ASEAN we are behind Indonesia, Thailand, Singapore, whom we used to dominate, and our one spot above basketball-playing Philippines.

The captain of our illustrious 1970’s side was Soh Chin Aun. Arumugam, Isa Bakar, Santokh Singh, James Wong and Mokhtar Dahari were heroes whose names rolled off the tongues of our schoolchildren as they copied them on the school field. It wasn’t about being the best in the world, but about being passionate and united and devoted to the game.

It was the same in Badminton, except at one time we were the best in the world. I remember Wong Peng Soon, the first Asian to win the All-England Championship, and then just dominated it throughout the 1950. Back home every kid who played badminton in every little kampong wanted to call himself Wong Peng Soon. There was no tinge of anybody identifying themselves exclusively as Chinese, Malays, Indian. Peng Soon was a Malaysian hero. Just like each of our football heroes. Now we do not have an iota of that feeling. Where has it all gone?

I don’t think it’s mere nostalgia that that makes us think there was a time when the sun shone more brightly upon Malaysia. I bring up sport because it has been a mirror of our more general performance as nation. When we were at ease with who we were and didn’t need slogans to do our best together, we did well. When race and money entered our game, we declined. The same applies to our political and economic life

Soon after independence we were already a highly successful developing country. We had begun the infrastructure building and diversification of our economy that would be the foundation for further growth. We carried out an import-substitution programme that stimulated local productive capacity. From there we started an infrastructure buildup which enabled a diversification of the economy leading to rapid industrialisation. We carried out effective programmes to raise rural income and help with landless with programmes such as FELDA. Our achievements in achieving growth with equity were recognised around the world. We were ahead of Our peer group in economic development were South Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan, and we led the pack. I remember we used to send technical consultants to advise the South Koreans.

By the lates nineties, however, we had fallen far behind this group and were competing with Thailand and Indonesia. Today, according to the latest World Investment Report, FDI into Malaysia is at about a twenty year low. We are entering the peer group of Cambodia, Myanmar and the Philippines as an investment destination. Thailand, despite a month long siege of the capital, attracted more FDI than we did last year. Indonesia and Vietnam far outperform us, not as a statistical blip but consistently. Soon we shall have difficulty keeping up with The Philippines. This, I believe, is called relegation. If we take into account FDI outflow, the picture is even more interesting. Last year we received US$1.38 billion (RM4.40 billion) in investments but US$ 8.04 billion flowed out. We are the only country in Southeast Asia which has suffered nett FDI outflow. I am not against outward investment. It can be a good thing for the country. But an imbalance on this scale indicates capital flight, not mere investment overseas.

Without a doubt, Malaysia is slipping. Billions have been looted from this country, and billions more are being siphoned out as our entire political structure crumbles. Yet we are gathered here in comfort, in a country that still seems to ‘work.’ Most of the time. This is due less to good management than to the extraordinary wealth of this country. You were born into a country of immense resources both natural and cultural and social. We have been wearing down this advantage with mismanagement and corruption. With lies, tall tales and theft. We have a political class unwilling or unable to address the central issue of the day because they have grown fat and comfortable with a system built on lies and theft. It is easy to fall into the lull caused by the combination of whatever wealth has not been plundered and removed and political class that lives in a bubble of sycophancy.

I urge you not to fall into that complacency. It is time to wake up. That waking up can begin here, right here, at this conference. Not tomorrow or the day after but today. So let me, as I have the honour of opening this conference, suggest the following:

  • Overcome the urge to have our hopes for the future endorsed by the Prime Minister. He will have retired, and I’ll be long gone when your future arrives. The shape of your future is being determined now.
  • Resist the temptation to say “in line with” when we do something. Your projects, believe it or not, don’t have to be in line with any government campaign for them to be meaningful. You don’t need to polish anyone’s apple. Just get on with what you plan to do.
  • Do not put a lid on certain issues as “sensitive” because someone said they are. Or it is against the Social Contract. Or it is “politicisation”. You don’t need to have your conversation delimited by the hyper-sensitive among us. Sensitivity is often a club people use to hit each other with. Reasoned discussion of contentious issues builds understanding and trust. Test this idea.
  • It’s not “uber-liberal” to ask for an end to having politics, economic policy, education policy and everything and the kitchen sink determined by race. It’s called growing up. Go look up “liberal” in a dictionary.
  • Please resist the temptation to say Salam 1 malaysia, or Salam Vision 2020 or Salam Malaysia Boleh, or anything like that. Not even when you are reading the news. It’s embarrassing. I think it’s OK to say plain old salam the way the Holy Prophet did, wishing peace unto all humanity. You say you want to “promote intellectual discourse.” I take that to mean you want to have reasonable, thought-through and critical discussions, and slogans are the enemy of thought. Banish them.
  • Don’t let the politicians you have invited here talk down to you.
  • Don’t let them tell you how bright and “exuberant” you are, that you are the future of the nation, etc. If you close your eyes and flow with their flattery you have safely joined the caravan, a caravan taking the nation down a sink hole. If they tell you the future is in your hands kindly request that they hand that future over first. Ask them how come the youngest member of our cabinet is 45 and is full of discredited hacks? Our Merdeka cabinet had an average age below thirty. You’re not the first generation to be bright. Mine wasn’t too stupid. But you could be the first generation of students and young graduates in fifty years to push this nation through a major transformation. And it is a transformation we need desperately.
  • You will be told that much is expected of you, much has been given to you, and so forth. This is all true. Actually much has also been stolen from you. Over the last twenty five years, much of the immense wealth generated by our productive people and our vast resources has been looted. This was supposed to have been your patrimony. The uncomplicated sense of belonging fully, wholeheartedly, unreservedly, to this country, in all it diversity, that has been taken from you.

Our sense of ourselves as Malaysians, a free and united people, has been replaced by a tale of racial strife and resentment that continues to haunt us. The thing is, this tale is false.

The most precious thing you have been deprived of has been your history. Someone of my generation finds it hard to describe what must seem like a completely different country to you now. Malaysia was not born in strife but in unity. Our independence was achieved through a demonstration of unity by the people in supporting a multiracial government led by Tengku Abdul Rahman. That show of unity, demonstrated first through the municipal elections of 1952 and then through the Alliance’s landslide victory in the elections of 1955, showed that the people of Malaya were united in wanting their freedom.

We surprised the British, who thought we could not do this.

Today we are no longer as united as we were then. We are also less free. I don’t think this is a coincidence. It takes free people to have the psychological strength to overcome the confines of a racialised worldview. It takes free people to overcome those politicians bent on hanging on to power gained by racialising every feature of our life including our football teams.

Hence while you are at this conference, let me argue, that as an absolute minimum, we should call for the repeal of unjust and much abused Acts which are reversals of freedoms that we won at Merdeka.

I ask you in joining me in calling for the repeal of the ISA and the OSA. These draconian laws have been used, more often than not, as political tools rather than instruments of national security. They create a climate of fear. These days there is a trend among right wing nationalist groups to identify the ISA with the defence of Malay rights. This is a self-inflicted insult on Malay rights. As if our Constitutional protections needed draconian laws to enforce them. I wish they were as zealous in defending our right not to be robbed by a corrupt ruling elite. We don’t seem to be applying the law of the land there, let alone the ISA.

I ask you to join me in calling for the repeal of the Printing and Publications Act, and above all, the Universities and Colleges Act. I don’t see how you can pursue your student activism with such freedom and support in the UK and Eire while forgetting that your brethren at home are deprived of their basic rights of association and expression by the UCA. The UCA has done immense harm in dumbing down our universities.

We must have freedom as guaranteed under our Constitution. Freedom to assemble, associate, speak, write, move. This is basic. Even on matters of race and even on religious matters we should be able to speak freely, and we shall educate each other.

It is time to realise the dream of Dato’ Onn and the spirit of the Alliance, of Tunku Abdul Rahman. That dream was one of unity and a single Malaysian people. They went as far as they could with it in their time. Instead of taking on the torch we have reversed course. The next step for us as a country is to move beyond the infancy of race-based parties to a non-racial party system. Our race-based party system is the key political reason why we are a sick country, declining before our own eyes, with money fleeing and people telling their children not to come home after their studies.

So let us try to take 1 Malaysia seriously. Millions have been spent putting up billboards and adding the term to every conceivable thing. We even have cuti-cuti 1 Malaysia. Can’t take a normal holiday anymore.

This is all fine. Now let us see if it means anything. Let us see the Government of the day lead by example. 1 Malaysia is empty because it is propagated by a Government that promotes the racially-based party system that is the chief cause of our inability to grow up in our race relations. Our inability to grow up in our race relations is the chief reason why investors, and we ourselves, no longer have confidence in our economy. The reasons why we are behind Maldives in football, and behind the Philippines in FDI, are linked.

So let us take 1 Malaysia seriously, and convert Barisan Nasional into a party open to all citizens. Let it be a multiracial party open to direct membership. PR will be forced to do the same or be left behind the times. Then we shall have the vehicles for a two party, non-race-based system.

If Umno, MIC or MCA are afraid of losing supporters, let them get their members to join this new multiracial party. PR should do the same. Nobody need feel left out. Umno members can join en masse. The Hainanese Kopitiam Association can join whichever party they want, or both parties en masse if they like. We can maintain our cherished civil associations, however we choose to associate. But we drop all communalism when we compete for the ballot. When our candidates stand for Elections, let them ever after stand only as Malaysians, better or worse.

Now let’s have a discussion.

* Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah’s speech at the UKEC’s Fourth Malaysian Students Leadership Seminar in Kuala Lumpur on July 31, 2010.

Tuesday, 27 July 2010

Satu Lagi Projek (Bodoh) BN!!


Thu, 22 Jul 2010 06:13


By Queville To

KOTA KINABALU: Standing tall on an arid piece of land in Kudat is a dam that has cost the government RM300 million to build. Construction on the multi-million-ringgit project began five years ago and it is now almost complete.

It looks sturdy and well-built and appears like it could do what it was built to do -- hold sufficient water to quench the thirst of the district. But therein lies a problem. There is no water source anywhere in sight.

Now, the Sabah DAP has expressed grave concern that the soon-to-be-completed Milau Dam near Sikuati in the northern-most district of the state may end up as yet another white elephant.

Its concern was based on the fact that without a viable water source, the dam must depend on rain.

A downpour is a rarity here, considering that Kudat is known to be the driest place in Sabah.

Sabah DAP chief Hiew King Cheu made the observation following a fact-finding inspection by him and several DAP leaders at the project site last Saturday.

He said the inspection was prompted by some concerned local residents who doubted the feasibility of the project.

Hiew said he was told that the project was first proposed some 15 years ago, but never got off the ground due to strong objections and criticism from the people there who said there was no water source in the vicinity.

Nevertheless, the project started on Aug 1, 2005, and was supposed to be completed by the contractor on Jan 31, 2008. But extensions were granted and it is now estimated to be 99% complete.

Gross waste of public funds

The dam is supposed to supply water to the water treatment plant located a few kilometres away next to a small stream.

A new pipeline was also constructed to connect the treatment plant to the existing pipeline from Kota Marudu to Kudat to alleviate the perennial water shortage in the Kudat district.

“What is the use of the dam when there is no water source? Just depending on the rain will not be sufficient to supply the whole of Kudat district. This could well end up as another 'white elephant' project by the Barisan Nasional government,” Hiew said in a statement today.

Hiew, who is also the Kota Kinabalu Member of Parliament, said the dam was a glaring example of gross wastage of public funds.

He asked how the BN government could allow such a harebrained and wasteful project to go ahead and at the same time claim that it was cutting subsidies to the people to save money.

Hiew also claimed that compensation payments had not been fully disbursed by the state government to the affected villagers for the land acquired.

“We received many complaints during the visit. It is understood that the kampung folks received only about 75% of the compensation," he said.

"Why can’t the state government settle the payment quickly?” he asked, saying that it was a well- known fact that the people in the district are among the most deprived in the state.

Monday, 26 July 2010

Taib, "One of Asia’s greatest kleptocrats"??!! Malaysia Boleh!!!

Protest rally against Taib Mahmud's

upcoming visit to Oxford

Taib Mahmud has laughably advertised his UK visit as a promotion of ‘Green Development’ in Sarawak and will be focussing on the promotion of Islamic and Halal products, his latest venture, during his visit to Oxford.

Where – Entrance the Said Business School, Park End Street, Oxford

When – From 9.30 am Monday 26th July 2010-07-21

By Survival International

One of Asia’s greatest kleptocrats and single-handedly one of the most destructive forces against the environment, the Chief Minister of Sarawak, East Malaysia, Abdul Taib Mahmud, has been invited to present the opening address at the Said Business School’s inaugural Islamic Branding and Marketing Forum, Monday 26th July.

During his 30 years of iron grip over Malaysia’s Christian State, Taib Mahmud has systematically plundered a country once rich in natural resources, oil and timber. He and his family are now multi-billionaires, while indigenous tribes such as the legendary jungle nomads, the Penan, have been left destitute and robbed of their rightful hunting grounds.

Abdul Taib Mahmud has destroyed all but 3% of the Borneo jungle in the state, which had been handed all but intact into the care of his uncle, his predecessor. Numerous species, including the Orang Utan, proboscis monkey and a plethora of unique plant and animal life have been virtually wiped out by his rapacious and unsustainable plunder of the jungle.

The Penan are struggling to keep his loggers out of the last corners of their jungle, one of the most precious remaining areas of bio-diversity left on earth. Recent reports have revealed shocking evidence of their treatment at the hands of state-backed loggers, including the systematic rape and abuse of their women, an outrage that Taib Mahmud has refused to acknowledge or investigate.

Taib Mahmud’s ‘business interests’ are notorious. The whole state of Sarawak has been illegally absorbed into the possession of his cronies and family members through ‘privatisations’ and the handing out of palm oil and timber concessions, via arbitrary state acquisitions of native lands. He now runs the State as a family business, maintained through systematic electoral intimidation and fraud.

Taib Mahmud has laughably advertised his UK visit as a promotion of ‘Green Development’ in Sarawak and will be focussing on the promotion of Islamic and Halal products, his latest venture, during his visit to Oxford.

It is a standing disgrace that Oxford University should be extending a hand of welcome and supporting the status of such a man. His wealth and ability to endow is not in doubt, however there is no possible basis of legitimacy for such wealth, as can only be plainly apparent to all his hosts.

The people of Sarawak are struggling to rid themselves of this man and his parasitical family and to preserve their unique environmental heritage from his further ‘business ventures’. Please lend your support to their struggle and to the campaign to preserve what is left of the Book of Life and the Borneo Jungle’s natural wealth. Help fight for the survival of the Orang Utan and fellow creatures of the Asian Rainforest.

Be there to receive him and protest at the disgraceful invitation that has been extended to him by Oxford University and the Said Business School.

Contacts – Survival: Sophie Grig - sg@survivalinternational.org This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it

For further details on Taib Mahmud see www.sarawakreport.org

For background on the problems in Sarawak see Times articles

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article5908207.ece

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article6814891.ece

Saturday, 24 July 2010

BERNAMA - Stop making fools of yourselves with "Spin"!!

“I got the message from both Najib and Muhyiddin. That they still want to defend Little Napoleons like Nik Ali. I thank them for the message.”

In the Bernama story, the chief minister was quoted as follows: ““I accept the message from the prime minister and deputy prime minister...I thank them for the message.”

Guan Eng says livid over ‘false reporting’ by Bernama

UPDATED @ 03:54:15 PM 24-07-2010
July 24, 2010
Lim not impressed with Bernama's newsreport.

KUALA LUMPUR, July 24 — Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng attacked Bernama for “false reporting” today after the national news agency filed a story with an incomplete quote and suggesting that he had accepted in good faith a reproach from the prime minister and deputy prime minister.

“I am livid over the false reporting,” he told The Malaysian Insider.

The Malaysian Insider had published the story which was subsequently removed by Bernama from its wire service, and replaced with a revised copy at 3.12pm.

Bernama did not offer any explanation for why the story was replaced or for the mistakes.

According to Lim, he had told reporters, when asked about his ongoing spat with state development officer (SDO) Nik Ali Mat Yunus, that:

“I got the message from both Najib and Muhyiddin. That they still want to defend Little Napoleons like Nik Ali. I thank them for the message.”

In the Bernama story, the chief minister was quoted as follows: ““I accept the message from the prime minister and deputy prime minister...I thank them for the message.”

The Bernama story also claimed that Lim had “accepted in good faith the reproach from Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak and Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin over his attack on state development officer (SDO) Nik Ali Mat Yunus.”

The replaced story had the following significant changes.

That Lim only received “a message” from the prime minister and his deputy.

The key text appears now as recounted by Lim in his press release.

And the headline has been reworded: “Lim says Federal government protecting ‘little napoleon’

The change is seen as an immediate response by Bernama following a strongly worded letter to them from Lim’s press secretary Cheong Yin Fan which stated: “For Bernama to twist this clear but simple response into Lim accepting in good faith the reproach from both Najib and Muhyiddin is dishonest and false.

“What is most shocking is the response from that Bernama reporter when I called her up to complain. She replied that she heard Lim Guan Eng clearly say “Little Napoleon” but had left that phrase out so that the story can come out.

“If she had reported what I said exactly the story would not come out. I told her firmly that we want a true statement and if that cannot be truthful then don’t publish the story.”

Cheong described Bernama’s actions as unprofessional and unfair, adding that it lend suspicions to the belief that “the mainstream media is out to get and frame up Lim Guan Eng by any means possible.”

Friday, 23 July 2010

What a Crying Shame, Sidek!!

"The issue us no longer Nik Ali, the issue is KSN .... Why is it now you come out all the way to defend a 'Little Napoleon'? How committed are you towards reducing 'Little Napoleon' tendencies in the civil service?
- LGE
**************************************

**************************************
I am simply amazed that the country's top civil servant doesn't even understand the simple basic difference between a government and a political entity, and respect the very important fundamental principle of impartiality and neutrality of the civil service.

Decline in moral accountability?

-Thomas Lee


Friday, 23 July 2010

Chief Secretary to the Government Tan Sri Mohd Sidek Hassan has made himself look very foolish by asking whether it is wrong for civil servants to attend functions held by Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng, as he is the DAP secretary-general.

Sidek is apparently trying to justify the presence and participation of Penang state development officer Nik Ali
Mat Yunus at an Umno press conference, where the officer verbally lambasted Guan Eng and issued prepared press statements to criticize the chief minister.

I am simply amazed that the country's top civil servant doesn't even understand the simple basic difference between a government and a political entity, and respect the very important fundamental principle of impartiality and neutrality of the civil service.

Of course, civil servants have every right to accompany the chief minister or any minister to any function required by their duty to do so. When they attend and participate at such official state functions, including a state-initiated media conference, they are merely doing their job as civil servants serving the elected government of the day. They are not involved in partisan political activities, even though the chief minister or any other minister may be a leader of a political party.

When Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng holds a media conference and has the state secretary with him to brief the press on matters of the state, the state secretary is not violating the civil service code by being there. In fact, it is his duty to be there to help the chief minister answer questions from the press.

But if DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng attends a Teoh Beng Hock memorial service held by his party, a civil servant can only be there in his private personal capacity as Beng Hock's friend. He cannot be there on duty as civil servent accompanying Guan Eng.

In Nik Ali's case, he is definitely wrong to attend and participate in a press conference called by Umno to run down the chief minister. He has broken the sacrosanct cardinal principle of the impartiality of the civil service, and must face disciplinary action for it.

It is simply beyond comprehension that Sidek as Chief Secretary to the Government should endorse such a crude and uncouth behaviour and unconstitutional action by a senior civil servant.

Sidek has put himself in a very embarrasing position by giving a very silly comparison of himself holding a press conference together with the prime minister, and that of Nik Ali's participation of the Umno press conference.

“Is it be wrong if I hold a media conference with Datuk Seri Najib Razak? If it is his job as the prime minister and my job as the chief secretary, then it is not wrong I hold a press conference with him,” Sidek said.

Of course, it is not wrong! It is his job as chief secretary to serve the prime minister and accompany him if so required.

But Nik Ali's case is defintely not the same. As a civil servant, he should be non-partisan and should not be involved in politicking with Umno.

If Sidek does not understand such a simple distinction between what is government and what is politics, he is not fit to be the country's top civil servant.

And, even assuming that Nik Ali is a victim of harassment by the chief minister, there is a proper official channel for him to file his grievance and complaint -- to the Public Service Department head. Why should Nik Ali use, or rather allowed himself to be used, by a political party to launch an attack on the chief minister?

It is certainly ominous, in fact even sinister, that Nik Ali should chose to use a political vehicle to rucn down the chief minister elected by the people of Penang.

And, it surely is baleful that we have a Chief Secretary to the Government who would condone and absolve a senior civil servant from making political attacks against an elected government head.

The fact that Sidek has announced that no action would be taken against Nik Ali for his verbal assault on the chief minister deserves my commiseration to my fellow Malaysians for the decline in moral accoutability in our beloved country.

And, while I am still on this Nik Ali issue, I would like to comment on another ridiculous statement, this time by Penang Gerakan chairman Datuk Dr Teng Hock Nan who condemned Guan Eng for the fiasco.

Teng alleged that Guan Eng was out to gain political mileage and strengthen his position to garner more votes and support from the public in the next general election.

It is certainly ludicrous that Teng should make such a preposterous statement, but, seeing that he is from Gerakan, it is not surprising since most of its leaders are incongruously inept and lack the intelligence, let alone intellect, to understand basic issues affecting the people.

Teng and the imbeciles in Gerakan should throw in the towel and retire permanently from Penang since they are of no relevance and pertinence in the state.

They should stop making themselves look inane with their vacuous statements.