The RPK's Agenda- Throw a Tantrum & Sabotage ABU!!

*********************

"It is now very clear that ABU,
although about removing Umno from power,
is not about seeing a better government.
It is about weakening Malay political power.
While there is nothing wrong in ousting Umno
if those Malays in power are evil
and hence need to be removed.
But that is not the real reason why Umno needs to be removed.
It is because Umno represents Malay political power

and by removing Umno then the Malays would be weakened"
~ RPK, ‘The hidden racist agenda‘

*************************

UPDATE: Guys- just read RPK's reply to me ... (my comment was edited, btw)- he beats around the bush, and says that I "proved his point".
++++++++++++++++++++++++
written by Super Admin, March 23, 2012 20:06:47
cruzeiro, shake the tree and see what falls out of it. It works every time. At least it worked on you. And do you notice that when people can't rebut what you say they apply the strategy of attack the writer and raise personal issues? That was the exact point of this article, which you just helped me prove. This appears to be the strategy of the opposition. Yet you scream when they apply the same tactics to Anwar Ibrahim.

Thanks bro.

RPK
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
What a royal ass .... and he thinks he's being "smart".
*Sigh*

================================

If you are thinking that RPK is a hopelessly gullible fool under pressure, and is being an apologist for UMNO's racist policies- you're not alone ... (and mind you- this isn't the fist time).
His heart may be in the right place- but his mind is all so messed up.

Y'see, he- the "not so the great" RPK- knows it all.

He's got it all figured out- and his prophecies have all come true. Well, whaddaya know- He's a prophet!!
You wanna talk sacrifice? Heck, he's done more that Jesus Christ, man- watcha talkin' about!!
He's Da MAN .... and you better not criticise him- or the “petri-fied Petra-philes” will go “Ptooi” on you!!
(Don't believe me- ask Duke … he'll tell you.)

Everybody is wrong ... he's right.
Everybody is racist, he isn't (that's why, cozying up with the "chinese", he "campaigned for DAP" in 2008- after being rejected by PAS & PKR).
Everybody is stupid, he's like fantastically intelligent (like when he was screaming for an Islamist theocratic state those days when he was sucking up to PAS/ Hadi!!)

Anyone who disagrees with him on anything- is against him .... (but in the same breath, he also complains that the politicians do the same~!!) just like when he wrote on MT that I'm against MCLM for not supporting his unworkable & silly "not so independent candidate" plan.

The best part is- he claims that since he isn't a member of any party, he's a "free man" and not a "serf" to the politicians ... but he complains that he's been rejected by ALL parties!!
Waaahahaha- what a laugh!!!

These days he behaves like a very angry person who's spoiling for a pointless fight just to seek attention... just like a kid. RPK seems to be so obsessed with making a Royal ASS of himself.
He twists and turns in his rhetoric, doesn't consult his “allies” on anything-
He “ridicules partners”, works on a different game plan, and discredits a common platform, confuses people- then behaves so royally smug and condescending when people don't understand him.
He thinks that being able to confuse people makes him a “very clever person” … and hence his "English" must be too good for others- when even a country bumpkin or madman can confuse people!!

His problem is- he behaves like a selfish fighter cock who doesn't care about people, lacks diplomacy/tact, reasoning capacity and is so full of himself.
It is therefore not surprising that he has been ostracised by many (maybe most parties).

The way I look at it, this time around, he's teaming up with some "Dog" to sabotage ABU (aka Haris Ibrahim) ..... extremely childish he is- just like when he was having “mamak teh tarik” with somebody, and came up with the silly “Unity Govt” proposal to dance to the devils' tune.

Anyways- the bright side about it is the fact that, for RPK to come out so strongly against ABU, it must definitely be rattling some nerves out there in UMNO!!
Bravo, HARIS!!!

RPK doesn't realise that by being that “royal Ass” he is now, politicians who want/need teamwork don't want him with them- in fact they wouldn't want to be associated with him publicly, and any politicians worth his salt would keep him at arms length.

SO Pete- here's a reality you need to know …
You are not just what you think you are- you are the sum of that, how you are perceived by others, and what the environment makes of you!
So right now- while people do appreciate your ideas & rhetoric/ spin-doctoring, value your contributions, and believe in the many things you preach- nobody believes that you're trustworthy enough to work with.

So here goes from Haris- (to me he's just said, "F#$k U Too, Dude" ... ha, ha).

And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother’s eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own?

An example of "spanner in the works" ...

RPK's No Holds Barred: An example of bad damage control

Of True Ulamas & Charlatans ...

"A friend of God must have affection like the Sun.

Because when it rises, it is beneficial to all irrespective of

whether they are Muslim, Christian, or Hindu.

A friend of God must be generous like a river.

We all get water from the river to quench our thirst.

It does not discriminate whether we are good or bad

or whether we are a relation or a stranger.

A friend of God must display the hospitality like the earth.

It raises and cradles us in its lap,

and yet it is always under our feet. "

~Hazrat Khwaja Moinuddin Chishti Rehmatullah Alai..

==========================

(NOTE: This article is published here with apologies to Malaysiakini for the plagiarism- 'cos I believe it is a matter of significant public interest)

'Islam is not against Jews'

12:20PM Mar 21, 2012

The issue of whether Muslims should cooperate with Jews has sparked a debate after Perak mufti Harussani Zakaria said he is against working with Israeli Jews, even if they do not identify with Zionist ideology.

Opposing the view, former Perlis mufti Mohd Asri Zainul Abidin (left) pointed out that Islam is not against Jews, and that it is a religion that respects all races and does not punish any individual on the basis of ethnicity.

"Islam does not force people to embrace Islam or fight against (someone) because of different religion,” he said in a statement.

"Hence, Jews should not be punished because of their ethnicity or faith. The rivalry between Jewish community and Prophet Muhammad in history was due to the former’s hostility to Islam, not because of ethnicity.”

He said Prophet Muhammad had a Jewish wife, Safiyyah Huyai, and a Jewish friend named Abdullah Salam, and had mortgaged things to Jews, as well as visited ailing Jews.

"It showed that we can be nice to Jews on the basis of friendship which does not betray Islam or (or for the purpose) of preaching,” noted Ari, an influential Islamic scholar.

"Moreover, Surah al-Maidah in the Quran allows marriage with Jewish and Christian women categorised as Ahlul Kitab.”

Asri also quotedSurah al-Mumtahah, 8-9, a translated version of which states: ‘Allah does not forbid you from those who do not fight you because of religion and do not expel you from your homes, from being righteous toward them and acting justly toward them. Indeed, Allah loves those who act justly.

‘Allah only forbids you from those who fight you because of religion and expel you from your homes and aid in your expulsion - [Allah forbids] that you make allies of them. And whoever makes allies of them, then it is those who are the wrongdoers.”

This has become the basis for Muslims to engage people of different religions, Asri concluded.

The issue had been raised by PAS president Abdul Hadi Awang who said the party allows cooperation with Jews, especially in commerce, but rejected Zionism.

Harussani then claimed that Jews in Israel are kafir harbi (non-believers who wage war against Islam) as they consider Muslims to be their enemy and are colonising a Muslim country.

Roadblock - Bolehsia style ...

Facebook

And the Nominees are ....

"For the first time since it was set up 205 years ago,
the Royal Bolehsia Police will have its own mascot

as a symbol of pride and achievement."

- Purrnama

1. The Asian Buffalo

Known for its toughness- skin and body and brains,
utmost loyalty in carrying out orders despite the slop it has for food,

and its ability to wallow in mud to do its job,
it would depict the dedication with which an organisation is run.

2. The Mangy Dog
Known for its survival instincts,
its ability to rummage through rubbish
and even steal food to survive,
it may depict the resilience of a force.

3. The Vulture
Known for its ability to be the eye in the sky looking at happenings on the ground, and live off scavanging carcasses-

it may help portray the watchfulness and a nose for crime.

4. The Wolf
An extremely intelligent and ruthlessly efficient animal-
known to attack its prey in packs, with an acute sense of hearing and smell for victims, can help the people understand the efficiency with with a force is run.

5.The Pig
Need I say anything?

6. The Crocodile
Known for its ability to sit like a log for its unsuspecting victims it would devour by slamming shut its mighty jaws- may be able to give greater confidence to the general public on the workings of the organisation.

7. The Cow
This animal which appears to be the all-time favourite in Bolehsia,

would help people know that the organisation

can help you milk the resources of the nation fearlessly.
It has been stepped on, and yet has has been used by geniuses

to generate much envied publicity for the Bolehsian leadership.

Note:
While nominations are still open, voting may commence.
Please note that early vote-counting has been abolished,
and indelible ink in rainbow colors will be used.
Total number of postal votes is classified under OSA.
Any charges of cheating leveled against the Election Commision

has to take into account that "Motive" for cheating is irrelevant.

"WE WILL NOT NEGOTIATE WITH ROBBERS & THIEVES"- Comprende, Pete?

The People's Parliament

We are here, not because we are law-breakers; we are here in our efforts to become law-makers – Emmeline Pankhurst

Building the 2-party system we want, and not settling for what’s tossed at us

Posted on March 12, 2012

“PR benefited from hindraf,yet the indians in the state they controlled is no better off than during bn.A mutual friend of rpk,Mr Bala told me his disappointment especially in selangor.Why show increase in state revenue when the indians remain poor and neglected.
Why must there be hardcore poverty in tne richest state in the nation [as boasted by MB of selangor].It make me sick.
Hindraf should strike a better deal with bn and that is what two party system is about” – Comment by my friend, Sampalee, to my ‘Syabas Moorthy’ post.

____________________________________________

My focus in this post is the last sentence of Sampalee’s comment.

“Hindraf should strike a better deal with bn and that is what two party system is about”.

Something similar was put to me in a round table conference in March last year.

It was suggested that I should abandon my plainly anti-BN stance and leave the door open to see what BN has to offer and to negotiate with both sides of the political divide for the best deal that we can get for the rakyat.

My response was short.

“We do not and will not negotiate with robbers and thieves”.

A properly functioning 2-party system is one where either of the 2 parties on offer to govern are viable alternatives,

We do not have that now.

What we have now is a state of affairs that requires the total and complete removal of UMNO and BN from Putrajaya and as many of the state administrations as possible.

Who we instal in Putrajaya in substitution of UMNO and BN remains to be seen.

Pakatan Rakyat, or at least some of its component parties, of course, in combination with several other parties from Malaya, Sabah and Sarawak, will need to begin the work of rehabilitating the nation, taking the requisite steps to give full effect to the Malaysia Agreement 1963 and the 18 point / 20 point agreements, restoring institutions of state back to the rakyat, repealing all draconian laws and replacing the NEP with a more transparent and effective program to bring about real improvement to the lives of the 40% poor and long marginalised, and a complete overhaul of the electoral system.

And all exit doors must be sealed to prevent certain Tuns, Tan Sris and Datuks from fleeing jurisdiction.

As the new government strives to see these reforms through, we must watch and scrutinise their every move to ensure that they do not, in time, morph into a new BN.

BN, meanwhile, we can assume, will go through its own reforms.

In fact, many of us will step forward to help BN reform.

So that, in time, it will become a viable alternative to our newly installed government.

Only then, Sampalee, can we say we have a functioning 2-party system.

Only then, can we negotiate with BN.

Motive for MURDER? Bolehsia says, "Who Cares!?"

Flurry of calls between Azilah and Abdul Razak

Hafiz Yatim 8:17AM Mar 8, 2012

Several telephone calls were made between political analyst Abdul Razak Baginda and the first accused, chief inspector Azilah Hadri, on the night of Altantuya Shaariibuu's murder.

These include one shortly before the murder - stipulated on the charge sheet as between 10pm on Oct 19, 2006 and 1am Oct 20, 2006 - which saw Azilah and corporal Sirul Azhar Umar being convicted and sentenced to death.

Azilah had called Abdul Razak, a close confidant of then deputy prime minister Najib Razak, at 9.41pm on Oct 19, 2006, and the phone conversation lasted 40 seconds.

The call was recorded by the phone company within the vicinity of the Jalan Duta toll booth. The next day, at 10.41am, Azilah again talked to Abdul Razak for 32 seconds.

Azilah and Sirul (right) - both of whom were part of the security detail to protect the deputy premier - were jointly convicted in 2008 of murdering the Mongolian woman in a jungle clearing in Shah Alam six years ago.

However, the nature of conversation between Abdul Razak and Azilah was not known.

Azilah and Sirul took Altantuya outside Abdul Razak's home in Damansara Heights on the evening of Oct 19, after private investigator P Balasubramaniam, who was then working for the political analyst, handed her over to them.

Abdul Razak and his family were not at home at that time as they had gone out to break fast (it was Ramadan).

Azilah, however, had stated in his defence that he was nowhere near the vicinity of the said murder scene but claimed he was having a meal with his fiancee, Norazila Baharuddin, in Wangsa Maju.

The phone records are stated in the 70-page judgment by Shah Alam High Court judge Mohd Zaki Md Yasin, which was released recently following his verdict delivered over two years ago.

Longest call lasted a minute

There were also a number of other phone calls between Azilah and Abdul Razak on Oct 19 - the night of the murder - beginning at 7.57pm, then again at 8.36pm, 8.41pm, 8.54pm, 8.55pm, 9.08pm and the final one at 9.41pm.

The longest call of the seven calls was made by Abdul Razak to Azilah which lasted one minute.

The phone logs were used to prove that the two accused were close to the murder scene but judge Zaki did not touch on the nature of the phone conversations.

He however noted that the phone call records were heavily challenged by the defence team, which claimed they were not authentic and that they could have been altered or tampered with.

"As for me, I must admit that these data and their operations as explained by all those witnesses are highly technical. Thus, in the absence of other rebuttal witnesses, I am accepting the evidence on the face of it.

"All four (phone company) witnesses had testified as to the creation, production, arrangement and validation of those logs, the data of which were retrieved from their data system," said the judge.

The phone records dated between Oct 18, 2006 and Oct 28, 2006 run six pages in the written judgment.

Unanswered questions

It is learnt that the full judgment of the sensational murder case was not provided to the lawyers involved in the trial, but was published in the Current Law Journal 2012 1 CLJ.

The lengthy judgment also mentioned a note written by Abdul Razak, which was found on Azilah's bag with Abdul Razak's full address and his father's full name - Abdullah Malim Baginda.

This, the judge ruled, "was wholly consistent of an innocent man" seeking Azilah's help for the police to patrol the vicinity of Abdul Razak's house following the alleged blackmail by Altantuya, who was his former lover.

There are also the issue of alleged threats made by Abdul Razak when private eye Balasubramaniam (left) and his assistant K Suras Kumar went to Altantuya's room at Hotel Malaya, which was not addressed in the judgment.

Neither were allegations that Altantuya's travel records of entering Malaysia were allegedly deleted.

No motive was established for the murder and the judge said that while motive is relevant, it is not essential.

Both Azilah and Sirul have since filed an appeal against their convictions and the Court of Appeal will be setting a date tomorrow to hear the application.

The appeal has been pending for two years while awaiting the completion of the written judgment by Zaki.

Mong MUST RESIGN!!

• Mong Dagang Must Resign 7/3/2012
• 0

  • 6
  • 0

Podcast: Download (Duration: 2:00:00 — 109.9MB)

On our show today, we follow up on nationwide disapproval against infamous YB Mong Dagang who refused to apologize for terminating a pro-opposition disable farmer’s subsidies.

Instead, Mong went extra mile to criticize the man with physical disabilities for not ‘appreciating’ the government’s assistance in a 40 -minute long press conference.

To quote the inhumane Mong, “I feel I am not wrong…. Frusis can climb a fruit tree …only some deform in his hands and legs… I have proof Frusis assisted the Opposition….”

Hear the snippet of Mong’s defensive statement on our show today.

Also, we bring you comments from all walks of life, including activist Nicholas Mujah, a visually impaired welfare recipient, and politicians from both Pakatan Rakyat and Barisan Nasional who condemn this fundamentally undemocratic act, which is plainly abuse of power.

Meanwhile, a former civil servant wishes to have an open debate with Mong who does not understand the meaning of democracy and the definition of OKU.

Next, a headman from Simunjan explains why they reject BN’s new concept to develop their NCR land. Listen to his big plan.

And, will SPDP leaders welcome a new political party Parti Tenaga Rakyat Sarawak (TERAS) set up by the expelled SPDP 5? How about the promised resthouse at Sarawak General Hospital? Our presenters tell you more.

VISIT RADIO FREE SARAWAK HERE

ROSIE'S "Premier Award" and MoE's "Premier University"

====================

(Bernama) - NEW JERSEY: Stevens Institute of Technology, a premier private co-educational university focused on research and entrepreneurship and committed to exploring the frontiers of engineering, science, and management, yesterday bestowed its highest award on Rosmah Mansor, wife of the Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak.

====================

ROTFLMAOL!!!!!!

WHAT A SHAMELESS THING TO DO!!

Stevens Institute of Technology - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S...Technology

NJ Attorney General Matter
In 2009, after a two-year investigation by the New Jersey Attorney General…

• 90 Pages of Scandal | Inside Higher Ed
Sep 18, 2009 ... 90 Pages of Scandal ... Stevens Institute of Technology, New Jersey's attorney
general filed a lawsuit Thursday that describes the institute's top ...
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2009/09/18/stevens

Stevens Institute of Technology and Chief Face Accusations - NYTimes.com -http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12...wanted=all

The turmoil at Stevens can be traced to 2004, when Moody’s downgraded its bond ratings to near junk status because of operating deficits and rising debt.

Friday, 15 January 2010 00:00 Silvio Laccetti: Negative spotlight on Stevens Institute of Technology hurts school’s mission and New Jersey -
?http://www.newjerseynewsroom.com/commentary/silvio-laccetti-negative-spotlight-on-stevens-institute-of-technology-hurts-schools-mission-and-new-jersey

25 Colleges With the Worst Professors in 2011 - CBS News - http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-50...s-in-2011/

You be the judge.

Shalom.

STOP LYNAS!!